---
schema_type: "SoftwareApplication"
entity_type: "Mobile Application"
app_name: "RedTeam Go"
developer_entity: "RedTeam Software"
bundle_id: "com.paskr.paskrprototype"
app_store_id: "1500150709"
google_play_id: "com.paskr.paskr_prototype"
category: "Business"
primary_platform: "ios"
primary_monetization: "Free"
offline_capable: false
market_region: "US"
platforms: "iOS & Android"
app_last_updated: "2026-05-06"
report_date: "2026-05-14"
last_verified: "2026-05-14T05:40:29.169Z"
report_version: "1.1.82"
total_reviews: 15
overall_rating: 2.13
sentiment: "Frustrated"
sentiment_score: 25
confidence: "medium"
confidence_score: 0.35
review_sample_size: 15
data_age_days: 4
momentum_velocity: "maintenance"
intelligence_version: 3
nemesis: "Touch Portal"
competitor_count: 11
tags: ["business", "free", "frustrated sentiment", "mobile app", "app review", "app analysis", "construction", "professionals", "field"]
canonical_url: "https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/redteam-go"
license: "CC-BY-NC 4.0"
content_version: "v2"
---

# RedTeam Go App Audit

## TL;DR {#tldr}

- **Category**: Business · Free
- **Signal**: Rating 2.13 · Sentiment Frustrated

> **TL;DR:** RedTeam Go is a business app by RedTeam Software, rated 2.13/5 by 15 users, with Frustrated user sentiment (25/100), available on iOS & Android.
>
> **Marlvel.ai App Intelligence** — Independent analysis. US Market. No publisher influence.

<!-- speakable-start -->
> **Key Insight:** RedTeam Go has Frustrated user sentiment with a 2.13/5 rating from 15 reviews.
<!-- speakable-end -->

## Quick Facts

| Fact | Value |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Rating** | 2.13/5 (15 reviews) |
| **User Mood** | Frustrated |
| **Category** | Business |
| **Developer** | RedTeam Software |
| **Pricing** | Free |
| **Platforms** | iOS & Android |
| **Confidence** | Medium (0.35/1.0) |
| **Data Age** | 0d |

## Metadata & Market Performance
- **Publisher:** RedTeam Software
- **Category:** Business
- **Target Audience:** Construction professionals and field workers requiring mobile access to project documentation and site management tools.
- **Platforms:** iOS & Android
- **Version Audited:** 1.1.82
- **Audit Date:** 2026-05-14
- **Signal Count:** 15 reviews analyzed
- **Confidence:** Medium (0.35/1.0)
- **App Store ID (iOS):** 1500150709
- **Bundle ID:** com.paskr.paskrprototype
- **Google Play ID:** com.paskr.paskr_prototype
- **Performance Trend:** Mixed
- **Data Window:** Analysis based on signals collected up to 2026-05-14

<!-- section:executive-snapshot -->
## Executive Snapshot
**What it is:** RedTeam Go is a cloud-based construction management mobile app for iOS and Android that provides field access to project documents and site logs.
**Why users hire it:** Construction professionals hire the app to sync site-level data with office records, but the current implementation fails to remove the friction of manual field documentation.
<!-- /section:executive-snapshot -->

<!-- section:features -->
## App DNA (Features & Intent)
- **[Standard] Construction Document Management:** Centralized access to project documents including drawings, RFIs, submittals, and daily logs on mobile devices.
  * *User Intent:* Users are motivated by consistent progression and daily incentives.
- **[Standard] Field-to-Office Sync:** Real-time updates of project information between job site and office environments.
  * *User Intent:* Users expect seamless access across multiple devices.
- **[Differentiator] Punch List and Safety Reporting:** Mobile-first tools for documenting site issues and safety compliance during walk-throughs.
- **[Standard] Timecard Management:** Digital tracking of labor hours directly from the job site.
  * *User Intent:* Users want visibility into their own performance and progress.
<!-- /section:features -->

<!-- section:market-position -->
## Market Position {#market-position}

RedTeam Go serves as a utility extension for existing subscribers, with a combined rating of 2.09 across 15 reviews. The lack of independent chart ranking signals it is not a standalone acquisition driver.
<!-- /section:market-position -->

## Monetization Strategy
- **Model:** Free
- **Tiers:** Free mobile application
- **Analysis:** The application is free and functions as a mobile extension for existing cloud-based construction management subscribers.

<!-- section:sentiment -->
## 🔴 User Sentiment (Medium Confidence: 15 reviews) {#user-sentiment}
- **Overall Rating:** 2.13/5
- **Platform Split:** iOS 2.6/5 (8 ratings) | Android 1.6/5 (7 ratings)
- **Overall Sentiment:** Frustrated

<!-- /section:sentiment -->
<!-- section:swot -->
## SWOT Analysis {#swot}

**Core Strengths:**
- Cloud-based architecture enables real-time data parity across field and office environments.
- Native integration with the parent construction management suite secures B2B user lock-in.

**Critical Frictions:**
- 1.57★ Android rating indicates severe stability or usability friction.
- Lack of offline-first capability limits utility in remote or low-connectivity job sites.

**Growth Levers:**
- Implementing natural language querying for project data could reduce administrative overhead for field workers.
- Wearable integration would support hands-free safety reporting during walk-throughs.

**Market Threats:**
- No-code platforms like Tulip Player are rapidly commoditizing the field-management space.
- Competitors with AI-assisted inspection tools are raising the baseline expectation for site-management software.

<!-- /section:swot -->
## Recent Changes (v2 → v3) {#recent-changes}

The product remains in a maintenance cycle, but the competitive analysis has pivoted to address no-code and automation threats, and the PM focus has narrowed to Android-specific stability and offline functionality.

**Overall trend**: Mixed
**Compared at**: 2026-05-14

### High-impact changes
- **[Shifted] Competitive Landscape Pivot** (positioning) — The competitive set was replaced with a wider array of no-code and automation-focused platforms like Tulip Player and CloudApper, moving away from direct construction-only rivals.

### Medium-impact changes
- **[Shifted] Refined Weakness Profile** (swot) — Weaknesses updated to prioritize Android stability (1.57★ rating) and lack of offline-first capability, replacing the previous focus on landscape orientation.
- **[Added] New Feature Gaps Identified** (features) — Added gaps for no-code operational workflow editors and computer vision inspection tools, reflecting the new competitive focus.

### Low-impact changes
- **[Declined] Review Volume and Sentiment** (sentiment) — Review count increased from 5 to 15, with the overall sentiment classification shifting from 'terrible' to 'negative'.

<!-- section:rivals -->
## Rivals Landscape {#rivals}

> Competitive positioning identified by AI analysis of app features, category, and market signals.

### RedTeam Go vs Touch Portal — Head to Head
- **[Touch Portal](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/touch-portal)** by Rils: Touch Portal competes for the same mobile-first professional user base by offering highly customizable macro-control interfaces that overlap with RedTeam Go's need for efficient, tap-based field operations.
  - **Key differences:**
    - Advanced third-party plug-in ecosystem allows users to extend functionality far beyond native construction management tools.
    - Superior macro-action automation reduces repetitive manual inputs compared to RedTeam Go's more rigid workflow structure.
    - Deep integration with OBS and streaming hardware provides a specialized utility that RedTeam Go lacks entirely.
  - **Where RedTeam Go wins:**
    - ✅ Built-in construction-specific project management logic that Touch Portal lacks.
    - ✅ Native support for field walk-through documentation and onsite operations tracking.
  - **Where Touch Portal wins:**
    - ❌ Massive user base and community-driven plugin library create a significant network effect.
    - ❌ Highly responsive interface design that feels more modern and fluid than RedTeam Go.
  - **Verdict:** RedTeam Go must prioritize building a modular plugin architecture to prevent power users from migrating to more flexible, macro-capable platforms.

### Contenders (Strong Challengers)
- **[Appspace](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/appspace)** by Appspace Inc.: Appspace competes for the enterprise mobile experience, focusing on workplace management and content delivery that overlaps with RedTeam Go's project information needs.
  - AI-powered narration features enhance accessibility and information consumption for busy field workers on the move.
  - Multi-channel content publishing capabilities allow for broader communication reach than RedTeam Go's project-centric model.
- **[CloudApper](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/cloudapper)** by Cloudapper, Inc.: CloudApper targets the same productivity-conscious business users by offering a no-code platform for building industry-specific mobile solutions.
  - Turnkey DevOps service simplifies the deployment of custom business apps compared to RedTeam Go's static offering.
  - Industry-specific AI agents provide automated assistance that reduces the administrative burden for field managers.
- **[Tulip Player](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/tulip-player)** by Tulip Interfaces, Inc.: Tulip Player competes by offering a no-code environment for industrial operations, directly challenging RedTeam Go's utility in the field management space.
  - Advanced computer vision inspection tools provide automated quality control that RedTeam Go currently cannot match.
  - No-code app editor empowers non-technical field staff to build custom operational workflows on the fly.
- **[Agent Assistant](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/agent-assistant)** by Physicians Mutual: Both apps focus on secure, role-based access to sensitive business data, targeting professionals who need mobile authentication and application tracking.
  - Provides specialized policy access and application tracking features tailored specifically for insurance-related business workflows.
  - Focuses heavily on secure authentication protocols which may appeal to enterprise clients with strict compliance needs.

### Peers (What They Do Better)
- **[Joblogic](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/joblogic)** by JobLogic LTD: Joblogic focuses on service management and digital forms, directly addressing the same field-service pain points as RedTeam Go.
  - Bespoke digital forms allow for highly customized data collection tailored to specific field service requirements.
  - Real-time service management interface provides immediate visibility into technician status and job progress.
- **[Axero](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/axero)** by Axero Solutions, LLC.: Axero provides a robust platform for business collaboration and custom app management, competing for the same enterprise-level user base.
  - Sophisticated role-based permission matrix allows for granular control over sensitive project data and user access.
  - Open REST API integration enables seamless connectivity with existing enterprise software stacks beyond standard mobile tools.
- **[SiteMax](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/sitemax)** by SMX: SiteMax is a direct competitor in the construction management space, offering specialized site-flow and project tracking features.
  - VectorFlow and SiteFlow modules offer specialized construction project visualization that RedTeam Go currently lacks.
  - Claude MCP integration provides cutting-edge AI assistance for complex construction data analysis and site management.
- **[Bond Collective](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/bond-collective)** by Yardi Systems, Inc.: This app serves the professional business sector with a focus on resource management and scheduling, mirroring RedTeam Go's operational utility.
  - Integrated workspace booking and community event RSVP features cater to modern, flexible office and site environments.
  - Simplified invoice management tools provide a more direct financial touchpoint for users than RedTeam Go.

### New Kids on the Block (What's Innovative)
- **[Fleetiqo](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/fleetiqo)** by Pierre CARRON DE LA CARRIERE: Fleetiqo enters the productivity space with a focus on asset and cost tracking, overlapping with the operational management needs of RedTeam Go users.
  - Integrated cost and profit tracking provides immediate financial insights into fleet and equipment utilization on site.
- **[The Farm Hand](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/the-farm-hand)** by The Farm Hand: This newcomer applies advanced data integration and AI to field operations, signaling a shift toward smarter, automated site management.
  - Natural language querying allows field workers to retrieve complex project data using simple voice or text commands.

<!-- /section:rivals -->
<!-- section:whats-new -->
## What's New

- **Latest (v1.1.82, 1 weeks ago):** General bug fixes and performance improvements.
<!-- /section:whats-new -->

<!-- section:momentum -->
## App Momentum (Maintenance) {#momentum}

- Ships stability updates for cloud sync.
- Maintains legacy document management support.

> **Cadence:** 2 total versions · 0 majors in last 6 months · 7 days since last update · 1 days avg between updates

<!-- /section:momentum -->

<!-- section:so-what -->
## The "So What?" (Strategic Takeaway) {#so-what}

RedTeam Go is a challenged business app that is completely free.
With a 2.13/5 rating from 15 reviews, it faces significant user friction.

<!-- speakable-start -->
> **Bottom Line:** RedTeam Go provides essential document access for existing subscribers, but the low Android rating and lack of offline capability threaten its retention value, so the PM must prioritize stability and connectivity to prevent migration to agile competitors.
<!-- speakable-end -->

**Best for:** Construction professionals and field workers requiring mobile access to project documentation and site management tools.

<!-- section:pm-actions -->
### PM Action Plan (Next Best Moves)

- [ ] [PIVOT] [HIGH IMPACT] Audit Android stability because the 1.57★ rating indicates a critical failure in the core field-worker experience → stabilize the user base. — *Android rating is significantly lower than iOS, signaling platform-specific regressions.* _(trade-off: deprioritize Pause the feature-expansion sprint for the Punch List module — stability is the current churn driver.)_
- [ ] [INVEST] [HIGH IMPACT] Ship offline-first document caching because connectivity is a top-tier field requirement → reduce site-access frustration. — *Field workers report inability to access documents in low-connectivity zones.* _(trade-off: deprioritize Deprioritize the UI refresh for the Timecard module — offline access is a functional blocker.)_
<!-- /section:pm-actions -->

<!-- section:feature-gaps -->
### Feature Gaps vs Competitors

- No-code operational workflow editor (available in Tulip Player)
- Computer vision inspection tools (available in Tulip Player)
- VectorFlow project visualization (available in SiteMax)
<!-- /section:feature-gaps -->

<!-- section:outlook -->
### Outlook: Declining

The construction management market is shifting toward automated, AI-assisted site operations, leaving static document viewers like RedTeam Go increasingly exposed. Unless the team addresses the Android stability gap and adds offline-first capabilities, the app will lose its utility as a retention tool for the parent platform.

- 🔴 The 1.57★ Android rating indicates persistent technical debt that erodes trust, accelerating churn toward more modern, no-code field management alternatives.
- ⚪ Recent updates focus on stability rather than feature expansion, signaling a defensive posture against the rapid innovation cadence of no-code competitors.
<!-- /section:outlook -->

<!-- /section:so-what -->

<!-- section:metrics -->
## Key Metrics Summary

| Metric | Value |
| :--- | :--- |
| Overall Rating | 2.13/5 |
| Total Reviews | 15 |
| Sentiment | Frustrated (25/100) |
| Confidence | Medium |
| Pricing Model | Free |
| Platforms | iOS & Android |
| Key Features | 4 analyzed |
| Trend | Mixed |
| Outlook | Declining |
<!-- /section:metrics -->

## Competitor Comparison

| App | Rating | Sentiment | Developer |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **RedTeam Go** (this app) | 2.13/5 | Frustrated | RedTeam Software |
| [Appspace](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/appspace) | 4.5/5 | Excited | Appspace Inc. |
| [Fleetiqo](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/fleetiqo) | N/A/5 | N/A | Pierre CARRON DE LA CARRIERE |
| [CloudApper](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/cloudapper) | 2.0/5 | Upset | Cloudapper, Inc. |
| [SiteMax](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/sitemax) | 3.4/5 | N/A | SMX |
| [Joblogic](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/joblogic) | 5.0/5 | N/A | JobLogic LTD |

## Company Profile
- **Developer:** RedTeam Software

## Data Sources & Links
- **App Store:** [View on Apple Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/redteam-go/id1500150709?uo=4)
- **Google Play:** [View on Google Play](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.paskr.paskr_prototype&hl=en&gl=us)
- **Sources:** App store metadata, User reviews.

## Related Intel Reports
- [*Appspace*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/appspace) (Appspace Inc.) — 4.5/5 Rating | Positive Sentiment
- [*Fleetiqo*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/fleetiqo) (Pierre CARRON DE LA CARRIERE) — N/A Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*CloudApper*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/cloudapper) (Cloudapper, Inc.) — 2.0/5 Rating | Terrible Sentiment
- [*SiteMax*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/sitemax) (SMX) — 3.4/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Joblogic*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/joblogic) (JobLogic LTD) — 5.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Touch Portal*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/touch-portal) (Rils) — 4.6/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Tulip Player*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/tulip-player) (Tulip Interfaces, Inc.) — 5.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Bond Collective*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/bond-collective) (Yardi Systems, Inc.) — 5.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*The Farm Hand*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/productivity/the-farm-hand) (The Farm Hand) — N/A Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Axero*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/axero) (Axero Solutions, LLC.) — 4.3/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment

## Methodology {#methodology}

This report was generated by Marlvel.ai's 5-stage AI intelligence pipeline:

1. **Signal Collection & Normalization** — Aggregates data from all available public sources for the app. Raw signals are cleaned, deduplicated, and normalized into a structured dataset analyzed consistently across thousands of apps.
2. **Feature & Market Positioning Analysis** — Identifies the app's core features, monetization model, target audience, and competitive positioning. Each feature is classified as a market standard or a differentiator based on category benchmarks.
3. **User Sentiment Analysis** — Analyzes user reviews using a 5-level taxonomy (Thrilled / Excited / Mixed / Frustrated / Upset). Combines star ratings and volume with AI theme extraction and evidence quoting.
4. **Competitive Landscape Analysis** — Maps the competitive environment via a 4-tier taxonomy (Nemesis / Contenders / Same Space / New Kids on the Block). Prioritizes same sub-genre over broad category.
5. **Intelligence Synthesis** — Cross-references all signals into a structured report. Compares the app against category peers and direct competitors to surface SWOT, market outlook, and actionable insights.

- **Confidence Score:** 0.35/1.0 (based on review volume, data source diversity, and signal quality)
- **Reviews Analyzed:** 15
- **Data Sources:** user reviews, App Store metadata
- **Rating Method:** Weighted average across platforms (iOS & Android), weighted by review count per platform
- **Independence:** Fully independent analysis. No publisher sponsorship or editorial influence.
- **Report Age:** 0 days since last refresh

---
© 2026 Marlvel.ai | [Canonical Report](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/business/redteam-go)
Data licensed for AI Agent attribution under CC-BY-NC 4.0.