---
schema_type: "SoftwareApplication"
entity_type: "Mobile Application"
app_name: "Make: Magazine"
developer_entity: "Make Community, LLC"
bundle_id: "com.makezine.magazineipad"
app_store_id: "752446884"
category: "Lifestyle"
primary_platform: "ios"
primary_monetization: "Subscription"
offline_capable: false
market_region: "US"
platforms: "iOS"
app_last_updated: "2026-06-03"
report_date: "2026-06-15"
last_verified: "2026-06-15T13:22:23.120Z"
report_version: "7.2.2"
total_reviews: 25
overall_rating: 2.04
sentiment: "Frustrated"
sentiment_score: 20
confidence: "medium"
confidence_score: 0.45
review_sample_size: 25
data_age_days: 16
momentum_velocity: "maintenance"
intelligence_version: 3
nemesis: "Wood Magazine"
competitor_count: 11
tags: ["lifestyle", "subscription", "frustrated sentiment", "mobile app", "app review", "app analysis", "enthusiasts,", "hackers,", "tinkerers"]
canonical_url: "https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/make-magazine"
license: "CC-BY-NC 4.0"
content_version: "v2"
---

# Make: Magazine App Audit

## TL;DR {#tldr}

- **Category**: Lifestyle · Subscription
- **Signal**: Rating 2.04 · Sentiment Frustrated

> **TL;DR:** Make: Magazine is a lifestyle app by Make Community, LLC, rated 2.04/5 by 25 users, with Frustrated user sentiment (20/100), available on iOS.
>
> **Marlvel.ai App Intelligence** — Independent analysis. US Market. No publisher influence.

<!-- speakable-start -->
> **Key Insight:** Make: Magazine has Frustrated user sentiment with a 2.04/5 rating from 25 reviews.
<!-- speakable-end -->

## Quick Facts

| Fact | Value |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Rating** | 2.04/5 (25 reviews) |
| **User Mood** | Frustrated |
| **Category** | Lifestyle |
| **Developer** | Make Community, LLC |
| **Pricing** | Subscription |
| **Platforms** | iOS |
| **Confidence** | Medium (0.45/1.0) |
| **Data Age** | 0d |

## Metadata & Market Performance
- **Publisher:** Make Community, LLC
- **Category:** Lifestyle
- **Target Audience:** DIY enthusiasts, hackers, and tinkerers interested in electronics, robotics, and fabrication projects.
- **Platforms:** iOS
- **Version Audited:** 7.2.2
- **Audit Date:** 2026-06-15
- **Signal Count:** 49 reviews analyzed
- **Confidence:** Medium (0.45/1.0)
- **App Store ID (iOS):** 752446884
- **Bundle ID:** com.makezine.magazineipad
- **Performance Trend:** Declining
- **Data Window:** Analysis based on signals collected up to 2026-06-15

<!-- section:executive-snapshot -->
## Executive Snapshot
**What it is:** Make: Magazine is a digital publication for DIY enthusiasts, hackers, and tinkerers, providing project tutorials and maker profiles on iOS.
**Why users hire it:** Users hire Make: for expert-led technical know-how in electronics and robotics, but the app's poor stability forces them to seek more reliable instructional sources.
<!-- /section:executive-snapshot -->

<!-- section:features -->
## App DNA (Features & Intent)
- **[Standard] Digital Magazine Reader:** Full digital replica of the print magazine with project tutorials, maker profiles, and diagrams
  * *User Intent:* Users need clear guidance to understand and adopt the product quickly.
- **[Differentiator] Project Tutorials:** Step-by-step guides for electronics, robotics, 3D fabrication, and woodworking
  * *User Intent:* Users need clear guidance to understand and adopt the product quickly.
- **[Standard] Auto-Renewing Subscription:** Recurring billing cycle for annual access to four digital issues
  * *User Intent:* Users seek enhanced value through premium features.
<!-- /section:features -->

<!-- section:market-position -->
## Market Position {#market-position}

Make: Magazine operates in the Lifestyle category with a 2.04 rating across 25 reviews, signaling significant friction in the digital reading experience compared to niche hobbyist competitors.
<!-- /section:market-position -->

## Monetization Strategy
- **Model:** Subscription
- **Tiers:** Single issue for $8.75, One-year subscription (four issues) for $25.00
- **Analysis:** Subscription model anchored at $25.00 annually, utilizing a single-issue purchase option to lower the barrier for new users.

<!-- section:sentiment -->
## 🔴 User Sentiment (Medium Confidence: 25 reviews) {#user-sentiment}
- **Overall Rating:** 2.04/5
- **Platform Split:** iOS 2.0/5 (25 ratings)
- **Overall Sentiment:** Frustrated

<!-- /section:sentiment -->
<!-- section:swot -->
## SWOT Analysis {#swot}

**Core Strengths:**
- Strong brand identity within the hacker and DIY-tech community
- Deep technical content library for electronics and robotics

**Critical Frictions:**
- 2.04 rating on iOS indicates severe stability issues
- Lack of offline reading mode limits utility in workshop environments

**Growth Levers:**
- Implement offline reading to match nemesis capabilities
- Add skill-level filtering to broaden the appeal to beginner makers

**Market Threats:**
- Wood Magazine's higher user satisfaction erodes brand loyalty
- Niche competitors with better technical support capture the DIY-tech wallet share

<!-- /section:swot -->
## Recent Changes (v2 → v3) {#recent-changes}

The report shows a narrowing of the competitive focus toward niche-specific instructional apps and a clearer identification of feature gaps like offline reading.

**Overall trend**: Declining
**Compared at**: 2026-06-15

### High-impact changes
- **[Shifted] SWOT Analysis Refinement** (swot) — Weaknesses now explicitly cite the lack of offline reading mode, and threats shifted from general science publications to specific niche competitors like Wood Magazine.
- **[Shifted] Competitive Landscape Expansion** (positioning) — The competitive set was expanded from 4 to 12 entities, focusing on niche-specific instructional apps like Inside Crochet and Model Engineer & Workshop.

### Medium-impact changes
- **[Declined] Sentiment Confidence Reduction** (sentiment) — Confidence in sentiment analysis shifted from high to medium, following a decrease in the analyzed review count from 49 to 25.
- **[Added] Offline Reading Requirement** (features) — Offline reading mode was added to the feature gaps and PM action items as a necessary parity feature against Wood Magazine.

<!-- section:rivals -->
## Rivals Landscape {#rivals}

> Competitive positioning identified by AI analysis of app features, category, and market signals.

### Make: Magazine vs Wood Magazine — Head to Head
- **[Wood Magazine](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/wood-magazine)** by Meredith Corporation: Wood Magazine competes directly for the attention of DIY enthusiasts and makers by offering high-quality, project-based instructional content that mirrors the Make: magazine editorial focus.
  - **Key differences:**
    - Offers robust offline reading capabilities, ensuring users can access project plans in remote workshop environments.
    - Maintains a significantly higher user rating, suggesting superior content delivery and app stability compared to Make:.
    - Provides structured project plans that cater to specific skill levels, reducing the barrier to entry for beginners.
  - **Where Make: Magazine wins:**
    - ✅ Broader scope of maker content including electronics and robotics, whereas the nemesis is niche-focused on woodworking.
    - ✅ Stronger brand identity within the hacker and DIY-tech community compared to traditional woodworking publications.
  - **Where Wood Magazine wins:**
    - ❌ Higher app store rating and user satisfaction, indicating a more reliable and polished digital reading experience.
    - ❌ More consistent release cadence and feature updates, keeping the app relevant and functional for modern devices.
  - **Verdict:** Make: must prioritize technical stability and offline accessibility to close the satisfaction gap and retain its tech-savvy user base.

### Contenders (Strong Challengers)
- **[Inside Crochet](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/com-magazinecloner-insidecrochet)** by Pocketmags.com: While the craft differs, this app competes for the same 'maker' wallet share by providing pattern-based instructional content for creative hobbyists.
  - Features a dedicated pattern library that allows users to search and filter projects by specific technical requirements.
  - Offers integrated technical support, providing a safety net for users attempting complex projects for the first time.
- **[Model Engineer & Workshop](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/reference/com-magazinecloner-modelengineersworkshop)** by Mortons Media Group Ltd: This app serves the technical maker community with a focus on engineering and workshop projects, directly overlapping with Make:'s DIY electronics and robotics audience.
  - Curates a deep technical content library that provides long-term reference value beyond standard magazine issues.
  - Integrates community insights, fostering a collaborative environment that encourages user engagement and knowledge sharing.
- **[Woodsmith](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/magazines-newspapers/woodsmith)** by Active Interest Media, Inc: Woodsmith competes for the DIY maker audience by focusing on detailed, step-by-step project instructions and high-quality illustrations.
  - Provides granular subscription management and single-issue purchase options, offering more flexible monetization than a rigid model.
  - Utilizes detailed step-by-step illustrations that simplify complex assembly processes better than text-heavy digital magazine formats.
- **[FineScale Modeler](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/finescale-modeler)** by Flying Media Group, LLC: This app targets the same hobbyist demographic as Make: by providing specialized instructional content for model building and technical assembly.
  - Includes text-to-speech functionality, allowing users to consume instructional content while their hands are busy working.
  - Features a cross-platform account sync system that ensures seamless transition between mobile and desktop devices.

### Peers (What They Do Better)
- **[DIY Home Projects Ideas](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/diy-home-projects-ideas)** by Mobway Solutions SRL: This app targets the general DIY enthusiast, providing a repository of project ideas that competes with Make:'s tutorial content.
  - Facilitates user-submitted content, creating a community-driven repository of ideas that requires less editorial overhead than magazines.
  - Uses push notifications to alert users to new project ideas, driving higher engagement and app re-opening rates.
- **[Complete Cross Stitch Patterns](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/art-design/complete-cross-stitch-patterns)** by FOREFO: This app competes for the time and attention of hobbyists who value structured, skill-based project tutorials.
  - Implements a skill-level filtering system that helps users find projects appropriate for their current experience level.
  - Operates on a free access model that lowers the barrier to entry for new, casual hobbyists.
- **Stash Hub** by Douglas Todd: Stash Hub targets the organizational needs of makers, helping them track materials and projects similar to how a maker tracks their build progress.
  - Utilizes 'Magic Input' and 'Magic Mockup' features to automate inventory tracking and project visualization for users.
  - Provides robust cross-platform sync, ensuring that material inventories are always accessible regardless of the device used.
- **[織女日記 | Vega Knit](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/tools/com-hauserzmh-knitlog)** by hauser: This app serves the creative maker community by providing digital tools for pattern design and project management.
  - Includes a customizable pattern canvas that allows users to create and modify designs directly within the app.
  - Supports group editing functions, enabling collaborative project development which is currently absent in the Make: app.

### New Kids on the Block (What's Innovative)
- **[Walliz – DIY Wallpaper Collage](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/graphics-design/walliz-diy-wallpaper-collage)** by Hypernova Limited: This app targets the creative DIY aesthetic, focusing on visual design projects that appeal to the maker mindset.
  - Provides a specialized DIY wallpaper maker tool that allows users to create custom digital assets for personal use.
- **[TOOLHOP](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/social-networking/app-replit-toolhop)** by Daniel Crosby: TOOLHOP introduces a peer-to-peer model for tool sharing, addressing the logistical needs of the same maker audience Make: serves.
  - Enables peer-to-peer borrowing and equipment monetization, creating a circular economy for expensive maker tools and hardware.

<!-- /section:rivals -->
<!-- section:whats-new -->
## What's New

- **Latest (v7.2.2, 1 weeks ago):** General bug fixes and performance optimizations for iOS.
<!-- /section:whats-new -->

<!-- section:momentum -->
## App Momentum (Maintenance) {#momentum}

- No notable feature updates recently.

> **Cadence:** 1 total versions · 0 majors in last 6 months · 11 days since last update

<!-- /section:momentum -->

<!-- section:so-what -->
## The "So What?" (Strategic Takeaway) {#so-what}

Make: Magazine is a challenged lifestyle app that is available.
With a 2.04/5 rating from 25 reviews, it faces significant user friction.

<!-- speakable-start -->
> **Bottom Line:** Make: Magazine holds its category lead through strong brand authority but bleeds users to more stable niche publications, so revenue growth hinges on fixing the app's technical foundation.
<!-- speakable-end -->

**Best for:** DIY enthusiasts, hackers, and tinkerers interested in electronics, robotics, and fabrication projects.

<!-- section:pm-actions -->
### PM Action Plan (Next Best Moves)

- [ ] [INVEST] [HIGH IMPACT] Rebuild core navigation and stability because the 2.04 rating indicates high churn risk → improve retention — *The 2.04 rating is the primary indicator of user dissatisfaction and churn.* _(trade-off: deprioritize Pause all new content feature development for one cycle.)_
- [ ] [PIVOT] [MEDIUM IMPACT] Ship offline reading mode because it is a standard requirement for workshop-based DIY apps → increase utility — *Competitors like Wood Magazine offer offline capabilities, creating a parity gap.* _(trade-off: deprioritize Deprioritize the planned UI refresh for the magazine reader.)_
<!-- /section:pm-actions -->

<!-- section:feature-gaps -->
### Feature Gaps vs Competitors

- Offline reading mode (available in Wood Magazine)
- Skill-level filtering (available in Inside Crochet)
- Integrated technical support (available in Inside Crochet)
<!-- /section:feature-gaps -->

<!-- section:outlook -->
### Outlook: Declining

The DIY-tech market is consolidating around apps that offer reliable, workshop-ready instructional content. Make: Magazine remains exposed to churn until it addresses the stability gap, so the PM must prioritize technical hygiene over new content features to stop the outflow of loyal users.

- 🔴 The 2.04 rating indicates a failure to meet basic stability expectations, which accelerates churn toward more reliable hobbyist apps.
- ⚪ Recent updates have not introduced new features, suggesting the team is currently focused on maintenance rather than growth.
<!-- /section:outlook -->

<!-- /section:so-what -->

<!-- section:metrics -->
## Key Metrics Summary

| Metric | Value |
| :--- | :--- |
| Overall Rating | 2.04/5 |
| Total Reviews | 25 |
| Sentiment | Frustrated (20/100) |
| Confidence | Medium |
| Pricing Model | Subscription |
| Platforms | iOS |
| Key Features | 3 analyzed |
| Trend | Declining |
| Outlook | Declining |
<!-- /section:metrics -->

## Competitor Comparison

| App | Rating | Sentiment | Developer |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Make: Magazine** (this app) | 2.04/5 | Frustrated | Make Community, LLC |
| [Inside Crochet](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/com-magazinecloner-insidecrochet) | 5.0/5 | N/A | Pocketmags.com |
| [織女日記 | Vega Knit](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/tools/com-hauserzmh-knitlog) | 4.0/5 | N/A | hauser |
| [Model Engineer & Workshop](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/reference/com-magazinecloner-modelengineersworkshop) | 5.0/5 | N/A | Mortons Media Group Ltd |
| [TOOLHOP](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/social-networking/app-replit-toolhop) | 5.0/5 | N/A | Daniel Crosby |
| [Walliz – DIY Wallpaper Collage](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/graphics-design/walliz-diy-wallpaper-collage) | 2.0/5 | N/A | Hypernova Limited |

## Company Profile
- **Developer:** Make Community, LLC

## Data Sources & Links
- **App Store:** [View on Apple Store](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/make-magazine/id752446884?uo=4)
- **Sources:** App store metadata, User reviews.

## Related Intel Reports
- [*Inside Crochet*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/com-magazinecloner-insidecrochet) (Pocketmags.com) — 5.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*織女日記 | Vega Knit*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/tools/com-hauserzmh-knitlog) (hauser) — 4.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Model Engineer & Workshop*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/reference/com-magazinecloner-modelengineersworkshop) (Mortons Media Group Ltd) — 5.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*TOOLHOP*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/social-networking/app-replit-toolhop) (Daniel Crosby) — 5.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Walliz – DIY Wallpaper Collage*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/graphics-design/walliz-diy-wallpaper-collage) (Hypernova Limited) — 2.0/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Wood Magazine*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/wood-magazine) (Meredith Corporation) — 4.7/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*FineScale Modeler*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/finescale-modeler) (Flying Media Group, LLC) — 1.5/5 Rating | Negative Sentiment
- [*Woodsmith*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/magazines-newspapers/woodsmith) (Active Interest Media, Inc) — 3.7/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*Complete Cross Stitch Patterns*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/art-design/complete-cross-stitch-patterns) (FOREFO) — 3.8/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment
- [*DIY Home Projects Ideas*](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/diy-home-projects-ideas) (Mobway Solutions SRL) — 3.7/5 Rating | N/A Sentiment

## Methodology {#methodology}

This report was generated by Marlvel.ai's 5-stage AI intelligence pipeline:

1. **Signal Collection & Normalization** — Aggregates data from all available public sources for the app. Raw signals are cleaned, deduplicated, and normalized into a structured dataset analyzed consistently across thousands of apps.
2. **Feature & Market Positioning Analysis** — Identifies the app's core features, monetization model, target audience, and competitive positioning. Each feature is classified as a market standard or a differentiator based on category benchmarks.
3. **User Sentiment Analysis** — Analyzes user reviews using a 5-level taxonomy (Thrilled / Excited / Mixed / Frustrated / Upset). Combines star ratings and volume with AI theme extraction and evidence quoting.
4. **Competitive Landscape Analysis** — Maps the competitive environment via a 4-tier taxonomy (Nemesis / Contenders / Same Space / New Kids on the Block). Prioritizes same sub-genre over broad category.
5. **Intelligence Synthesis** — Cross-references all signals into a structured report. Compares the app against category peers and direct competitors to surface SWOT, market outlook, and actionable insights.

- **Confidence Score:** 0.45/1.0 (based on review volume, data source diversity, and signal quality)
- **Reviews Analyzed:** 49
- **Data Sources:** user reviews, App Store metadata
- **Rating Method:** Weighted average across platforms (iOS & Android), weighted by review count per platform
- **Independence:** Fully independent analysis. No publisher sponsorship or editorial influence.
- **Report Age:** 0 days since last refresh

---
© 2026 Marlvel.ai | [Canonical Report](https://marlvel.ai/intel-report/lifestyle/make-magazine)
Data licensed for AI Agent attribution under CC-BY-NC 4.0.