By Mark Rogers
Report updated Apr 21, 2026
Basketball Analytics
For basketball coaches, team managers, and parents who need a reliable, digital alternative to paper-and-pencil stat tracking for games and seasons.
Basketball Analytics is an established sports app that is a paid app. With a 5.0/5 rating from 1 reviews, it shows polarized user reception.
What is Basketball Analytics?
Current Momentum
v1.04 · 2mo ago
MaintenanceBasketball Analytics is currently in maintenance mode, with the last update focused on accessibility improvements.
Active Nemesis
GameChanger
By GameChanger Media
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
SportsNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
How Is The App's Momentum Right Now?
Loading...
What Are The Key Features?
Tracks standard basketball metrics including points, rebounds, assists, blocks, steals, turnovers, and fouls.
Allows users to define three additional statistics beyond the standard set to tailor tracking to specific team needs.
Ability to log the specific game time for each recorded statistic.
How much does it cost?
- One-time purchase of $2.99 USD
A straightforward, low-cost premium model that avoids subscriptions and ads, appealing to coaches and parents looking for a simple, one-time utility.
Who Built It?
Mark Rogers
Providing specialized digital stat-tracking and timing tools for niche sports coaches and referees. Replacing manual paper-based workflows with high-speed, sport-specific mobile interfaces.
Portfolio
8
Apps
Who is Mark Rogers?
The publisher operates a highly focused, vertical-specific utility model, targeting amateur and semi-pro sports management where generalist platforms fail to capture granular, sport-specific metrics. By prioritizing rapid, two-tap data entry, they solve the primary friction point of real-time stat tracking during fast-paced matches. Their strategy relies on deep domain specialization—such as specific kick-out logic for water polo or penalty corner tracking for field hockey—to build a moat against broader, less-specialized sports apps.
Who is Mark Rogers for?
- Coaches
- Referees
- Team managers requiring portable
- Digital alternatives to manual paper tracking
Portfolio momentum
Released 11 updates across 8 apps in the last 6 months, demonstrating a high-frequency maintenance and feature-iteration cycle.
What other apps does Mark Rogers make?
What do users think recently?
Analysis in progress, available soon
What is the competitive landscape for Basketball Analytics?
How's The Sports Market?
How does it evolve in the Sports market?
| Country | Category | Chart | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇿 Tanzania | Sports | iOSPaid | #11 |
The rivals identified
The Nemesis
- -
Integrated live video streaming and automated 'GameStream' play-by-play for remote fans; target is a local-only stat tracker.
- -
Platform-wide team management including roster syncing and scheduling vs. target's manual-entry, single-user utility model.
Contenders
Direct API integration with NBN23 digital scoresheets for automated data entry; target requires manual tracking for every play.
Public-facing player rankings and league leaderboards vs. target's private, local-only data storage.
TeamSnap
★4.8 (58.8K)TeamSnap, Inc.
⚡A high-velocity competitor (9 releases in 6 months) that captures the same audience by anchoring stats within a logistics and communication platform.
End-to-end team logistics including availability tracking and payment collection; target focuses exclusively on in-game performance metrics.
Cross-platform support (iOS/Android) ensures data accessibility for all team members, unlike the target's iOS-only restriction.
Peers
iScout Basketball
★4.8 (530)Blackbelt Apps LLC
🚀A direct functional peer focused on deep scouting and professional-grade analytics for coaches rather than team management.
Advanced visual scouting tools including shot charts and heat maps; target is limited to text-based box score percentages.
Target app offers three user-defined custom stat slots, providing flexibility for niche metrics that iScout's fixed scouting templates lack.
The outtake for Basketball Analytics
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Customizable stat slots for niche metrics
- One-time $2.99 purchase model (no subscriptions)
- Time-stamped logging for detailed game flow analysis
- Private, local-first data management
Critical Frictions
- iOS-only availability
- Lacks visual analytics like shot charts or heat maps
- Manual data entry only (no automation/API)
- Minimal social proof (1 rating, 0 reviews)
Growth Levers
- Expansion to Android platform
- Integration of visual scouting tools
- Marketing to 'anti-subscription' coaching demographics
Market Threats
- Ecosystem dominance by GameChanger
- Rise of automated AI video stat tracking
- Cross-platform accessibility of TeamSnap
What are the next best moves?
Develop visual shot charts and heat maps.
Directly addresses a feature gap identified in peer competitor iScout Basketball, moving the app from a box-score tool to a scouting tool.
Launch an Android version of the application.
Competitors like TeamSnap and GameChanger leverage cross-platform support to capture entire teams; iOS-only restriction is a major churn/acquisition risk.
Market the '3 Customizable Stats' as a core differentiator.
This is a unique feature not found in standard scouting templates, allowing coaches to track proprietary metrics.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Live video streaming (available in GameChanger)
- Cross-platform/Android support (available in TeamSnap)
- Visual shot charts and heat maps (available in iScout Basketball)
- Automated API data integration (available in SWISH by NBN23)
Key Takeaways
If I were the PM, I would pivot this app from a 'digital pencil' to a 'visual analyst' by adding shot charts while strictly maintaining the $2.99 one-time fee. The app's survival depends on being the high-utility, low-cost alternative for coaches who are alienated by the complex, subscription-heavy ecosystems of market leaders like GameChanger.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
v1.04 update (Jan 2026) focused on accessibility (large fonts) rather than new feature expansion.
Low rating volume (1 total) suggests limited market penetration despite being active for nearly two years.