By Figure 53
Report updated May 12, 2026
QLab Remote
For professional theatre technicians, stage managers, and lighting designers using QLab for live show control.
QLab Remote is a well-regarded utilities app that is free with in-app purchases. With a 4.7/5 rating from 25 reviews, it maintains solid user satisfaction. Users particularly appreciate remote cue flagging and note editing, though network connectivity dependency remains a common concern.
What is QLab Remote?
QLab Remote is an iOS companion app for remote control of QLab live show software, enabling mobile cue management and parameter adjustment.
Technicians hire the app to maintain show control from the stage, removing the need for constant booth communication during tech rehearsals.
Current Momentum
v5.5 · 3w ago
Maintenance- Maintains high 4.68 rating.
- Ships feature updates for iOS.
Active Nemesis
Fragmented niche
No dominant direct rival identified yet — see Other Rivals below.
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
UtilitiesNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
Recent User MoodAI-powered deep analysis surfacing high-signal insights. Still in beta, accuracy improves daily. For informational purposes only.
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
How Is The App's Momentum Right Now?
Loading...
What Are The Key Features?
Allows users to view workspaces and follow along without triggering cues or modifying data
Enables remote execution of cues, playhead movement, and parameter adjustment via in-app purchase
Provides a dedicated keypad for interacting with QLab Light Dashboards and instrument checks
How much does it cost?
- Free Read-Only Mode
- Paid in-app purchase for Show Control, Editing, and Light Tools
Freemium model allows free observation for team members while gating professional control features behind a one-time or feature-specific purchase.
Who Built It?
Enrichment in progress
Publisher profile available very soon
What other apps does Figure 53 make?
What do users think recently?
Medium confidence · 11 reviews analyzed
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a excited sentiment. Users appreciate remote cue flagging and note editing, but report network connectivity dependency.
Limited review volume (11 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.
What is the competitive landscape for QLab Remote?
How's The Utilities Market?
How does it evolve in the Utilities market?
QLab Remote maintains a 4.68 rating across 25 ratings, serving as the primary mobile extension for the QLab macOS ecosystem. The lack of feature parity on Android (v3.0.6 vs v5.5.5 on iOS) limits its reach in mixed-device production environments.
| Country | Category | Chart | Rank | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇪 Estonia | Utilities | iOSGrossing | #41 | ▼25 |
| 🇪🇸 Spain | Utilities | iOSGrossing | #92 | NEW |
The rivals identified
Peers
Includes robust digital document management and check-in workflows absent from the media-focused QLab Remote interface.
Leverages a high-volume transactional user base compared to the niche, professional creative audience of QLab.
Prioritizes GPS-based event routing and real-time field data sync, contrasting with QLab's media-centric playback control.
Designed for high-stakes public safety workflows, whereas QLab Remote is optimized for theatrical and event production.
EspBlufi
★3.3 (3)ESPRESSIF SYSTEMS (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
These apps act as specialized utility bridges for configuring and managing hardware devices over wireless protocols.
Functions as a low-level hardware provisioning tool rather than a high-level creative show control interface.
Supports custom data transmission protocols for IoT devices, lacking the media-specific command sets of QLab.
Xerox® Easy Assist
Xerox Corporation
Both apps function as specialized remote control interfaces for complex professional hardware systems, requiring stable local network connectivity.
Focuses on enterprise hardware diagnostics rather than the creative live-performance control workflows found in QLab.
Provides integrated device security and support ticketing features that QLab Remote lacks for its users.
The outtake for QLab Remote
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Direct macOS integration functions as a high-switching-cost barrier for professional theatre production teams
- Read-Only mode enables team-wide adoption without risking accidental cue triggers during live shows
Critical Frictions
- Android version lags behind iOS in feature parity and update frequency
- Connectivity dependency on local networks creates a single point of failure for remote control
Growth Levers
- Expanding Android feature parity could capture the growing segment of production crews using non-Apple tablets
- Developing offline-sync capabilities would mitigate current network-dependency complaints
Market Threats
- Cross-platform show-control alternatives could displace QLab Remote in mixed-OS production environments
- Network-stability issues in crowded venue environments drive negative sentiment and churn
What are the next best moves?
Ship Android feature parity because the current version gap limits adoption in mixed-device crews → increase total addressable market
Android version is significantly behind iOS, creating a barrier for non-Apple users in professional settings.
Trade-off: Pause the development of new iOS-only light tools — Android parity has higher impact on user acquisition.
Audit network-reconnect logic because connectivity drops are the top complaint → reduce real-time feedback frustration
User reviews cite network instability as the primary friction point during live shows.
Trade-off: Same-quarter capacity available — no major lever displaced.
A counter-intuitive read
The app's reliance on a stable local network is not a technical flaw but a deliberate safety constraint that prevents accidental remote triggers in high-stakes live environments.
Key Takeaways
QLab Remote dominates the professional theatre niche through deep macOS integration, but the Android feature gap and network-dependency risks threaten its long-term retention, so the PM should prioritize cross-platform parity to secure the user base against emerging alternatives.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
The live-performance control market is consolidating around stable, integrated solutions, and QLab Remote is well-positioned as the standard for macOS users. However, the lack of Android feature parity leaves the app vulnerable to cross-platform competitors, so the PM must prioritize platform parity to prevent segment erosion.
High user rating (4.68) indicates strong product-market fit within the professional theatre production segment.
Android version lag creates a persistent churn risk for crews using mixed-device hardware in production.