a Haber vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against a Haber's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

a Haber
This App
Core Identity
DeveloperTurkuvaz Radyo TV Haberlesme ve Yayincilik A.S.BrokoliCBGudn.comDOGUS YAYIN GRUBU A.S.CHEAH Wen Feng
CategoryNewsNewsNewsNewsNewsMagazines & Newspapers
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.5 / 54.4 / 53.6 / 54.4 / 51.5 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count329576602,357230
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 21, 2011Nov 17, 2009Dec 8, 2009May 5, 2010Aug 31, 2010Jul 31, 2025
Last UpdatedJan 5, 2026May 6, 2026Apr 30, 2026Apr 29, 2026May 12, 2026Mar 17, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterrible-----
Score15/100-----
Praises
  • Historical user base appreciates the core news delivery and editorial content
-----
Complaints
  • Frequent application crashes and instability prevent reliable access to news content
  • Excessive and intrusive advertising disrupts the reading and viewing experience
-----
Requests
  • Customization options to filter out unwanted content categories like sports news
-----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • 24/7 live broadcast integration sustains daily session frequency
  • Turkuvaz media network provides exclusive editorial content
  • Hyper-local notification triggers create a retention loop that national aggregators cannot easily replicate.
  • Strong brand authority within the Turkish domestic market
  • HT Dokun bridge creates a unique print-to-digital transition
  • Trusted editorial brand authority sustains long-term reader loyalty
  • Smartwatch integration provides a unique mobile-state synchronization utility
  • Editorial authority derived from NTV Spor broadcasting brand sustains user trust in news accuracy
  • Personalized news tracking creates a baseline retention loop for team-specific fans
-
Weaknesses
  • High crash rate on launch prevents reliable access
  • Excessive ad-density between paragraphs frustrates users
  • Lack of neutral reporting drives negative sentiment
  • Ad-heavy monetization model creates a poor user experience compared to subscription-based peers.
  • Static navigation menu lacks personalization
  • Ad-heavy interface degrades the reading experience
  • No recurring revenue stream
  • Subscription-only archive access limits top-of-funnel conversion
  • 0.34 rating gap between Android and iOS platforms
  • Android-iOS rating gap indicates inconsistent performance across the majority user base
  • Ad-heavy experience without a premium tier limits user satisfaction and retention
-
Pricingfreefreefreefreemiumfreefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceActive-
Update Cadence2 versions, ~8d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg3 versions, ~2d avg-

Compare a Haber head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by a Haber, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0