Low confidence · Latest 63 of 98 total reviews analyzed · Based on 98 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate graphical representation of forecast model uncertainty provides clarity for weather-dependent planning, but report subscription pricing model lacks value and feels excessive for a standard weather utility.
Rating: 4.7
Reviews: 98
Confidence: low
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.7/ 5
★★★★★★
(1.8K)Current version
4.7/ 5
0.0 vs overall
★★★★★★
(1.8K)Main signal post-update: graphical representation of forecast model uncertainty provides clarity for weather-dependent planning.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Rating over time
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Releases:MajorMinorPatch1 release in range
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Graphical representation of forecast model uncertainty provides clarity for weather-dependent planning
- “Users appreciate the visual treatment of error bars in forecasting”
- “The graphical display of forecast uncertainty is cited as a superior feature”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Subscription pricing model lacks value and feels excessive for a standard weather utility
- “Users frequently label the annual cost as an egregious money grab”
- “The lack of a one-time purchase option is a recurring point of friction”
Request
Most requested
- Native support for tablet and desktop platforms to enable cross-device weather monitoring
- “Users request dedicated layouts for larger screen devices”
- “The lack of native tablet and desktop apps is a barrier to long-term subscription”