Actions For Obsidian vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Actions For Obsidian's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperCarlo ZottmannBrite TechnologiesMohamed ElgoharyStatNote IncJordan ZelenyArtsPlanetDigital Software Labs
CategoryProductivityProductivityProductivityMedicalProductivityProductivitySocial Networking
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.5 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count3986894832800
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 12, 2023Jan 9, 2026Jan 11, 2025Jan 16, 2022Mar 11, 2023Apr 23, 2026Apr 16, 2026
Last UpdatedApr 22, 2026May 7, 2026Mar 31, 2026Apr 21, 2026Feb 5, 2025May 15, 2026Apr 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentexcellent--positive---
Score90/100--75/100---
Praises---
  • AI scribe functionality significantly reduces documentation time for busy clinicians during daily patient encounters
---
Complaints---
  • Transcription accuracy issues with medical terminology and common words frustrate users during rapid dictation
---
Requests---
  • Direct integration with EHR systems to eliminate the need for manual browser extension entry
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Deep Apple Shortcuts integration functions as a technical barrier for non-native note-taking apps
  • Dataview support creates high switching costs for power users
-
  • Lightweight interface reduces friction for rapid text expansion
  • Universal keyboard integration enables cross-app text insertion
  • AI-driven SOAP note generation reduces charting time from 30 to 7 minutes per encounter
  • Keyboard extension enables direct insertion into third-party apps
  • Local-only architecture appeals to privacy-conscious users
  • Single-tap copy interface minimizes interaction time
  • High-quality character animations provide a unique emotional engagement loop
  • Widget-first design enables immediate home-screen visibility
  • Simple UX architecture reduces cognitive load for rapid contact logging
  • Dedicated reminder system creates a specific retention loop for relationship management
Weaknesses
  • One-time payment model lacks recurring revenue for sustained development
  • Manual configuration requirements limit the total addressable market
-
  • Lack of secure folder functionality compared to nemesis apps
  • No cloud synchronization for text templates across devices
  • Mandatory MFA implementation creates login friction for clinicians needing rapid access during high-pressure shifts
  • No cloud-based synchronization across devices
  • Lacks advanced automation triggers found in rivals
  • Zero Android rating volume suggests low discoverability
  • No cloud-sync functionality limits multi-device utility
  • Absence of OCR or AI-summarization tools restricts power-user adoption
  • Manual data entry requirement creates high friction compared to AI-transcription tools
  • No cloud-sync architecture limits multi-device utility
Pricingpaidfreefreesubscriptionfreefreefree
MomentumMaintenance-MaintenanceActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence1 versions-1 versions5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~5d avg5 versions, ~204d avg1 versions1 versions

Compare Actions For Obsidian head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Actions For Obsidian, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0