All And One Lotto Randomizer vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against All And One Lotto Randomizer's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperPhilip MonyCultivate Digital, LLCSangwook SuhSea ParkRobert ReinhartDejan AtanasovSynetouch IncOrestes MelgarejoJackpot Warehouse LimitedG203 Studios LLC
CategoryEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentReferenceEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainment
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.6 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.3 / 55.0 / 54.7 / 52.0 / 53.0 / 5
Ratings Count089921210021342
PriceUSD0.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 6, 2021Dec 20, 2022May 30, 2025Apr 30, 2025Jan 18, 2023Aug 29, 2022Sep 20, 2025Dec 30, 2017Dec 23, 2024Nov 4, 2020
Last UpdatedFeb 6, 2021Sep 17, 2025Nov 19, 2025Apr 30, 2025Jan 18, 2023Sep 11, 2025Feb 4, 2026Dec 13, 2025Dec 23, 2024Feb 9, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-mixedexcellent--terrible-mixed-mixed
Score-45/10090/100--10/100-50/100-45/100
Praises-
  • The core lottery number generation logic provides consistent entertainment value for casual players
  • Core gameplay loop provides a satisfying experience for long-term mobile users
----
  • Simple number selection process allows users to play their preferred games without store clerk intervention
  • Historical data analysis feature helps users identify numbers that have not appeared in previous draws
-
  • Simple lottery number checking functionality provides basic utility for casual users
Complaints-
  • System instability and feature failures following the latest update disrupt the user experience
  • Perceived lack of efficacy in number prediction leads to user frustration with the app
---
  • Mandatory credit card entry during account creation prevents access for privacy-conscious users
-
  • Frequent application crashes prevent users from accessing core functionality during their intended play sessions
-
  • Aggressive advertisement frequency disrupts the core user experience on every click
  • Inaccurate lottery state coverage fails to include specific regional game selections
  • Lack of clear visual indicators for winning numbers complicates ticket verification
Requests-
  • Users desire clear information regarding winning number patterns to improve their predictive success
--------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Proprietary grid-based balancing system for odd/even and high/low distribution
  • Statistical filtering logic provides a distinct utility for data-oriented lottery players
  • Subscription-gated premium features create a clear monetization path
  • Analytical frequency patterns provide utility for recurring players [Feature Analysis]
  • One-tap interface minimizes friction for casual users
  • Manual historical data input provides a specific analytical control mechanism for power users.
  • Reference-first UI avoids clutter found in high-feature competitors
  • Statistical pattern engine provides a clear differentiator for data-driven players
  • Subscription model with annual discount incentivizes long-term retention
  • Simple manual number selection interface bypasses store-clerk intervention
  • Hyper-focused New York market data provides a niche entry point for state-specific players.
  • Neutral third-party interface provides a platform-agnostic alternative to state-specific bloatware
  • Ticket scanning utility creates a high-frequency engagement loop
Weaknesses
  • Zero ratings on iOS platform
  • No social proof to build user trust
  • 0.15★ rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Recent stability regressions in the latest update erode core utility
  • No post-draw ticket verification [Competitor Analysis]
  • Ad-only monetization limits revenue per user [Pricing Strategy]
  • No ticket saving or historical data persistence
  • 1 total rating limits social proof
  • Zero-revenue model lacks monetization levers for sustainable development.
  • Manual-entry workflow creates high friction for casual users.
  • Mandatory credit card entry at account creation drives immediate churn
  • Manual data entry requirements create high user friction
  • Lack of real-time draw notifications limits daily active usage
  • Frequent application crashes during core utility sessions
  • Zero-star reports on stability indicate high churn risk
  • 2.0-star rating across 4 reviews indicates a failure to deliver on core utility.
  • No official ticket scanning technology limits the app's retention potential.
  • Aggressive ad frequency disrupts core navigation
  • Lack of regional lottery support limits total addressable market
  • Manual verification required due to poor match highlighting
Pricingpaidsubscriptionfreefreefreefreesubscriptionfreefreefreemium
MomentumZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieZombieZombieMaintenanceZombieZombieMaintenance
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, ~4d avg2 versions, ~161d avg1 versions1 versions1 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo1 versions1 versions2 versions, ~4d avg

Compare All And One Lotto Randomizer head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by All And One Lotto Randomizer, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0