askM vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against askM's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

askM
This App
Core Identity
DeveloperPhilippe Le GallBrendan WholihanCorporate Smalltalk Consulting LtdLyker Labs LLCifm electronic gmbhJIRI CHOMAT
CategoryReferenceWeatherBusinessReferenceBusinessReference
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 51.0 / 53.0 / 54.6 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count0216100
PriceFree$0.99$8.99FreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 14, 2026Jul 17, 2009Feb 15, 2011Nov 22, 2020Apr 10, 2019Dec 10, 2025
Last UpdatedApr 14, 2026Nov 16, 2014Oct 12, 2023Feb 11, 2025Apr 10, 2019Dec 10, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment---positive--
Score---75/100--
Praises---
  • Statute accessibility on mobile devices provides immediate utility for legal research and homework
--
Complaints---
  • Inaccurate or outdated legal data leads to professional errors during critical work tasks
--
Requests------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Local vector index enables offline privacy-compliant Q&A
  • Dark-mode viewer optimized for flight deck environments
  • Spin-dial input mechanism prevents invalid data entry during high-pressure flight preparation
-
  • Offline-first architecture enables usage in courtrooms
  • Volume licensing program unlocks B2B distribution
  • Offline-first architecture ensures technical data access in remote industrial sites
  • B2B integration with ifm electronic gmbh hardware creates a captive user base
  • Offline-first architecture enables reliable access in low-connectivity environments
  • Annotation tools increase user switching costs via personalized data
  • Official source sync maintains data integrity
Weaknesses
  • Zero commercial licensing model
  • No team-management or administrative control features
  • Lack of native document annotation tools
  • 1-star rating on iOS platform signals critical stability issues
  • Last update in 2014 leaves the app incompatible with modern iOS standards
-
  • Reported data inaccuracies erode professional trust
  • Lack of real-time verification limits primary-source utility
  • Zero rating count indicates low user engagement
  • Lack of document annotation tools limits utility compared to specialized reference apps
  • Zero monetization strategy limits long-term development resources
  • No team-based licensing prevents B2B market entry
  • Lack of user reviews signals low market trust
Pricingfreepaidpaidsubscriptionfreefree
MomentumMaintenance--ZombieZombieZombie
Update Cadence2 versions, ~70d avg--1 versions2 versions, ~2590d avg1 versions

Compare askM head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by askM, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0