High confidence · 85 reviews analyzed · Based on 85 reviews. Signal may be noisy.

Upset

Recent user voice shows a upset sentiment. Users appreciate detailed insect descriptions provide educational value for students and nature enthusiasts and collection feature allows users to organize and track their insect discoveries, but report aggressive subscription paywalls prevent users from accessing core identification features and inaccurate identification results frequently mislabel common insects as different species.

Rating: 3.5

Reviews: 85

Confidence: high

How did the latest release land?

Overall
3.8/ 5
(1.2K)
Current version
3.9/ 5
+0.2 vs overall
(766)
Main signal post-update: detailed insect descriptions provide educational value for students and nature enthusiasts.

How have ratings & review volume moved?

Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.

Rating over time

Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.

Review themes

Praise

What users love

  • Detailed insect descriptions provide educational value for students and nature enthusiasts
    • Users appreciate the encyclopedia-style information provided for identified insects
    • The educational content helps users understand the ecological role of local insects
  • Collection feature allows users to organize and track their insect discoveries
    • The ability to save finds in collections is cited as a useful tool for field studies
    • Users find the organization of past identifications convenient for personal research
Complaint

Common complaints

  • Aggressive subscription paywalls prevent users from accessing core identification features
    • Users report being unable to use the app without committing to a paid subscription
    • The lack of a truly free trial experience leads to accusations of deceptive marketing
  • Inaccurate identification results frequently mislabel common insects as different species
    • Users report receiving wildly different results when scanning the same insect multiple times
    • The identification algorithm often fails to distinguish between basic insect types like ants and bees
  • Restrictive image processing errors incorrectly flag clear photos as too blurry or small
    • High-resolution images are frequently rejected by the app for being too small or blurry
    • Users find the camera requirements overly sensitive and difficult to satisfy in real-world conditions
Request

Most requested

  • Transparent subscription cancellation processes are needed to prevent unwanted recurring charges
    • Users struggle to find clear instructions or buttons to cancel their active subscriptions
    • Multiple reports of difficulty in stopping auto-renewal after the trial period

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Bug ID - Insect Identifier, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0