Cal AI - Calorie Tracker user reviews, decoded
High confidence · 50 reviews analyzed · Based on 50 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Review voice lately leans frustrated. Users appreciate ai-driven food logging provides a convenient and fast way for users to track daily caloric intake and consistent usage of the calorie tracking tools has helped many users achieve measurable weight loss goals, but report inaccurate nutritional data and macro estimates from photo scans force users to manually correct their logs.
Rating: 4.8
Reviews: 50
Confidence: high
The latest update lacks specific fixes for the persistent AI accuracy and subscription transparency issues, leaving these as active complaints.
How did the latest release land?
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Review themes
What users love
- AI-driven food logging provides a convenient and fast way for users to track daily caloric intake
- Consistent usage of the calorie tracking tools has helped many users achieve measurable weight loss goals
Common complaints
- Inaccurate nutritional data and macro estimates from photo scans force users to manually correct their logs
Most requested
Full sentiment breakdown
Access the full report for freeAI summary. Key signals synthesized from the latest 50 reviews. Updated regularly.