Car and Driver Magazine US vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Car and Driver Magazine US's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Autocar
Contender
What Car?
Contender
Auto Express
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperHachette Filipacchi Media U.S.Carwow Studio LimitedHaymarketHaymarketCarwow Studio LimitedAxel Springer España S.A.Valnet IncPXRMotor Sport Magazine LimitedThe Drive Media Inc.
CategoryLifestyleLifestyleSportsReferenceLifestyleNewsNewsNewsSportsSports
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.5 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 54.6 / 54.4 / 55.0 / 53.4 / 52.3 / 54.8 / 54.0 / 5
Ratings Count2,520306449161540375147
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateSep 23, 2010Dec 20, 2010Feb 22, 2012Mar 8, 2012Dec 9, 2012Jun 10, 2012Sep 20, 2010Sep 10, 2010Dec 13, 2011Jun 9, 2011
Last UpdatedMay 30, 2025Jul 21, 2025Feb 4, 2026Feb 4, 2026Jan 15, 2025Sep 3, 2025Oct 2, 2022May 4, 2026Feb 23, 2026Jan 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-terrible----negativenegativemixedterrible
Score-15/100----25/10020/10065/10025/100
Praises-
  • High quality motoring journalism and photography remain the primary reasons for long-term subscriber loyalty
----
  • Comprehensive car database and news coverage provided high value for automotive enthusiasts
-
  • High-quality journalism and historical racing insights keep long-term readers deeply engaged with the publication
  • High quality outdoor writing and photography keep long-term readers engaged with the content
Complaints-
  • Frequent application crashes and launch failures prevent access to paid content across multiple mobile devices
  • Digital edition format changes to static scans make reading articles difficult on mobile screen sizes
----
  • Application fails to launch and remains stuck on the startup screen post-update
  • Mobile interface friction
  • Offline reading functionality fails to work as expected despite successful download of magazine issues
  • Subscription access failures prevent users from reading issues they have already paid for
  • Application crashes and download failures block access to new and archived magazine issues
Requests-
  • Return to interactive digital layouts instead of static scanned pages for better mobile readability
----
  • Restore technical specifications and trim data to maintain parity with previous versions
-
  • Full print edition layout view requested to improve the reading experience on tablet devices
  • Integration of print subscriptions to allow free digital access for loyal magazine readers
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Editorial authority across performance reporting sustains brand equity
  • Timed-preview model lowers the barrier for initial content discovery
  • Expert editorial standards sustain long-term subscriber loyalty [Editorial Quality]
  • Track day discounts provide tangible B2B-linked value [Subscriber Perks]
  • Editorial authority built on definitive comparison tests
  • Cross-platform purchase recovery via Pocketmags sync
  • Proprietary reliability survey data sustains reader trust
  • Established UK market authority drives high-intent traffic
  • Editorial authority in UK-specific car group tests
  • Proprietary future-model renders drive enthusiast retention
  • Rigorous editorial content establishes high authority in the Spanish automotive market
  • Pocketmags account integration provides consistent cross-platform access
  • BuzzScore system establishes editorial authority
  • Broad manufacturer database captures search traffic
  • Autojunk community platform creates unique content loop
  • Established editorial brand authority in Dutch market
  • Historical archive dating to 1924 functions as a content moat
  • Editorial quality sustains high long-term subscriber loyalty
  • 128-year editorial authority sustains brand trust
  • Multimedia integration increases session duration
  • Affiliate gear reviews monetize editorial expertise
Weaknesses
  • 2.98 rating on Android indicates significant platform-specific stability issues
  • Lack of interactive community features limits daily active usage
  • 2.0★ rating on Android indicates severe stability gaps [Android Performance]
  • Static scanned page format degrades readability on mobile screens [UX Design]
  • Static reading experience lacks interactive elements
  • High friction for new users compared to web-native news apps
  • Subscription-only access limits top-of-funnel discovery
  • Lack of social sharing features reduces organic growth
  • Premium tier at £69.99/year above category median
  • Lack of interactive consumer decision tools
  • Subscription model lacks a free-tier conversion funnel
  • Static reading experience lacks interactive social features
  • App launch failure on startup
  • Removal of technical trim data
  • Lack of tablet landscape support
  • 2.33★ rating indicates severe mobile usability friction
  • Lack of feature updates in the latest release
  • Offline reading system is unreliable
  • Search and navigation functions are counter-intuitive
  • 3.66 Android rating indicates critical stability issues
  • Subscription authentication failures block paid access
  • Lack of responsive customer support drives churn
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreesubscriptionfree
MomentumZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieZombieZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~235d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg2 versions, ~75d avg1 versions2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~27d avg1 versions1 versions2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~3d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~25d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg

Compare Car and Driver Magazine US head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Car and Driver Magazine US, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0