MARLVEL

Check-In by Social Tables vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Check-In by Social Tables's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Check-In by Social Tables
This App
The Event App by EventsAir
Nemesis
Seamless
Contender
SailPoint Events
Contender
Sage Intacct Advantage
Contender
HQMENA
Contender
Arrow Electronics Events
Peer
Dude Solutions Connect
Peer
POSSIBLE 2026
Peer
Raymond James Meetings
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperSocial Tables Inc.Centium Software Pty LtdTerrapinn Holdings Pty LtdSailPoint TechnologiesSage IntacctForex And Crypto ExpoArrow Electronics, Inc.Brightly Software, Inc.Hyve Group PLCRaymond James Financial
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivityBusiness
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating2.5 / 52.2 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 53.0 / 52.0 / 53.6 / 5
Ratings Count2565238022119
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJul 13, 2016Sep 28, 2016Jan 12, 2023Sep 14, 2023Oct 10, 2018Jan 5, 2024Nov 8, 2022Apr 11, 2019Apr 13, 2026Jan 3, 2017
Last UpdatedMay 18, 2026Apr 29, 2026May 8, 2026Feb 9, 2026Oct 10, 2019May 14, 2026May 2, 2026Aug 27, 2020Apr 28, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativeterrible-excellent-----negative
Score30/10015/100-90/100-----25/100
Praises---
  • The core attendee experience provides a fun and engaging interaction for users during events
-----
  • The initial event registration process provides clear instructions for attendees via email communication
Complaints-
  • Persistent update prompts and installation errors prevent users from accessing conference event content
  • Navigation and interface design flaws force users to scroll excessively to find current schedule items
  • Excessive permission requests and frequent crashes disrupt the user experience during critical event attendance
-------
  • Lack of self-service password reset functionality prevents users from accessing their event accounts
  • Absence of technical support channels leaves users stranded without assistance for login failures
Requests-
  • Offline access functionality is required to mitigate reliance on unstable conference center network connections
-------
  • Implementation of a password recovery or account reset feature on the login screen
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Cvent enterprise integration functions as a B2B distribution moat
  • Multi-device synchronization enables high-volume event throughput
  • Enterprise-grade parent platform provides B2B distribution channel
  • Lightweight feature set serves low-complexity event needs
  • High-fidelity agenda navigation facilitates complex event schedules
  • Attendee-to-attendee networking suite drives pre-event engagement
  • Direct integration into the SailPoint identity management ecosystem provides a cohesive experience for existing corporate users.
  • Focused, bloat-free interface sustains high user satisfaction
  • Deep integration with Sage Intacct for CPE tracking
-
  • Secure authentication mechanism restricts proprietary data access
  • Asset lifecycle management integration functions as a B2B distribution barrier into enterprise facility partnerships
-
  • Deep integration with internal Raymond James event ecosystems ensures proprietary branding consistency.
Weaknesses
  • 2.5-star rating indicates poor user experience
  • No feature updates in the latest release
  • Reliance on legacy architecture
  • 2.2-star rating reflects critical stability failures
  • Persistent update-loop bugs prevent content access
  • Lack of offline data access frustrates users
  • Zero offline functionality limits utility in high-congestion venues
  • No native badge printing integration increases on-site operational friction
  • Absence of interactive networking features like matchmaking or gamification limits attendee engagement compared to enterprise-grade rivals.
  • Static networking tools limit attendee engagement
  • Lack of offline mode creates operational risk
  • No lead-capture functionality for exhibitors
-
  • Third-party infrastructure dependency limits custom feature development
  • Static event-only architecture limits user retention beyond the two-day training window
-
  • Critical usability failures in account recovery prevent user access.
  • Lack of technical support channels exacerbates login frustration.
Pricingfreemiumfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceIntenseIntenseMaintenanceZombieIntenseMaintenanceZombie-Maintenance
Update Cadence1 versions5 versions2 versions, ~2d avg2 versions, ~60d avg1 versions5 versions2 versions, ~11d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo-2 versions, ~2d avg

Compare Check-In by Social Tables head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Check-In by Social Tables, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0