MARLVEL

Climber UK Magazine vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Climber UK Magazine's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Climber UK Magazine
This App
Alpinist Magazine
Nemesis
Mein DAV+
Peer
einstein Boulder
Peer
ClimbAlong
Peer
Sailing Today Mag
Peer
Khamai
New Kid
Tampereen kiipeilykeskus
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperWarners Group Publications PLCHeight of Land PublicationsAlpenverein München & OberlandWiseGym OynorthtechChelsea Magazine CompanyFABIAN ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ MORENOWiseGym Oy
CategorySportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSports
PlatformiOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.8 / 54.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count1333400300
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 14, 2013Oct 16, 2012Feb 9, 2024Oct 17, 2023Jun 18, 2021Jan 20, 2014Feb 21, 2026Dec 10, 2025
Last UpdatedJun 26, 2024Sep 13, 2024Mar 10, 2026May 13, 2026Apr 23, 2026Nov 13, 2025Apr 7, 2026Dec 10, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--------
Score--------
Praises--------
Complaints--------
Requests--------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Editorial authority in the British climbing market sustains a loyal, niche-specific readership
  • Editorial prestige anchored by Reinhold Messner's endorsement
  • Pocketmags integration provides cross-platform purchase protection
  • Offline access supports remote-location reading
-
  • Multi-location WiseGym integration provides a unified member experience across seven sites.
-
  • Expert-led editorial content builds high brand authority within the cruising community
-
  • Direct integration with facility management backend provides a reliable administrative utility for members
Weaknesses
  • Dependence on the Pocketmags infrastructure prevents custom UI development for the reading experience
  • Subscription model lacks interactive features
  • No community-driven content or social loops
  • UI is static compared to modern mobile publishing standards
-
  • Zero social features or community walls limit user engagement beyond transactional tasks.
-
  • High-friction subscription model lacks free entry-level utility
  • Zero Android rating activity indicates poor platform-specific engagement
-
  • Lack of social engagement features limits the app to a transactional role
  • Absence of event-specific tools like live scoring reduces utility for active climbers
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreefreesubscriptionfreemiumfree
MomentumZombieZombieActiveMaintenanceIntenseMaintenanceActiveZombie
Update Cadence1 versions, 1 majors/6mo1 versions, 1 majors/6mo5 versions2 versions, ~0d avg5 versions5 versions, ~135d avg5 versions2 versions, ~1d avg

Compare Climber UK Magazine head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Climber UK Magazine, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0