High confidence · Latest 100 of 122 total reviews analyzed · Based on 122 reviews. Signal may be noisy.

Frustrated

Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate structured and layered communication style from specific astrologers provides clarity for users during sessions, but report perceived use of automated bots instead of human astrologers leads to generic or inaccurate predictions.

Rating: 4.7

Reviews: 122

Confidence: high

How did the latest release land?

Overall
4.7/ 5
(1.5M)
Current version
4.7/ 5
+0.0 vs overall
(12.2K)
Main signal post-update: structured and layered communication style from specific astrologers provides clarity for users during sessions.

Sentiment over time

Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.

Review themes

Praise

What users love

  • Structured and layered communication style from specific astrologers provides clarity for users during sessions
    • Users appreciate when astrologers break down complex topics into manageable, layered explanations
Complaint

Common complaints

  • Perceived use of automated bots instead of human astrologers leads to generic or inaccurate predictions
    • Users frequently report that responses feel scripted, repetitive, or generated by AI rather than a person
Request

Most requested

  • Transparent refund policies and reliable customer service channels are needed to address transaction disputes
    • Users demand refunds for sessions where they felt the service was fraudulent or the app malfunctioned

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Astrotalk - Talk to Astrologer, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0