Report updated Jun 10, 2026

WhosDue is a well-regarded productivity app that is a paid app. With a 4.3/5 rating from 121 reviews, it maintains solid user satisfaction. Users particularly appreciate mobile accessibility of breeding records allows for real-time data entry in the barn environment, though lack of data synchronization across multiple devices forces users to purchase separate licenses remains a common concern.

What is WhosDue?

WhosDue is a record-keeping and performance-tracking app for rabbit and cavy breeders on iOS and Android.

Breeders hire the app to replace manual cage cards with digital, show-ready documentation that provides performance statistics for breeding decisions.

Current Momentum

v4.14 · 1mo ago

Active
  • Resolved pedigree printing issues.
  • Updated for latest OS compatibility.

Active Nemesis

Livestocked

Livestocked

By SITEMESH

7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸

Productivity
#89
NEW

Rating Pulse 🇺🇸

Recent User Mood

What makes this app unique?

What Does It Look Like?

What Are The Key Features?

Breeding and Litter TrackingStandard

Logs breeding dates, litter sizes, and weaning schedules with automatic buck and doe record updates.

Performance StatisticsDifferentiator

Calculates average survival rates and litter sizes per breed, sorted by performance metrics.

Pedigree and Cage Card PrintingDifferentiator

Generates printable 3x5 cage cards and pedigrees with custom logo support.

How much does it cost?

Paid
  • $9.99 one-time purchase

Flat-fee paid model with no IAP or subscription, targeting professional and hobbyist breeders with a single upfront cost.

Who Built It?

Brian Smith app icon

Equipping rabbit and cavy breeders with offline-capable tools to manage pedigrees and production metrics.

Portfolio

1

Apps

Explore the full Brian Smith report

Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Brian Smith.

Go deeper

What do users think recently?

High confidence · 35 reviews analyzed

How did the latest release land?

Overall
4.3/ 5
(121)
Current version
4.4/ 5
+0.1 vs overall
(47)
Main signal post-update: mobile accessibility of breeding records allows for real-time data entry in the barn environment.

What is the recent mood?

Excited

Recent user voice shows a excited sentiment. Users appreciate mobile accessibility of breeding records allows for real-time data entry in the barn environment, but report lack of data synchronization across multiple devices forces users to purchase separate licenses.

Limited review volume (35 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.

View the full user-sentiment analysis

Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.

Go deeper

What is the competitive landscape for WhosDue?

Where is it available?

Localized markets (1)

United States

How's The Productivity Market?

**Pricing**: $9.99 one-time purchase, targeting hobbyist and 4-H breeders. **Audience**: Rabbit and cavy breeders requiring organized husbandry and show-ready documentation. **Chart Performance**: The app maintains a presence in the Productivity category, though it faces visibility challenges in global markets compared to its US niche performance.

How does it evolve in the Productivity market?

WhosDue maintains a stable 4.35-star rating across 121 total ratings, positioning it as a reliable utility for niche breeders. The $9.99 price point remains competitive against subscription-based livestock management tools.

Rank progression

10 active rankings tracked — 30-day window

The rivals identified

Nemeses(1)

Livestocked icon
Livestockedmoat: medium

SITEMESH LLC

4.1(212)

Livestocked serves the exact same niche of animal breeding management with a significantly larger user base and longer market presence.

Differentiators

  • Maintains a decade-long track record of data storage, providing a deeper historical archive for long-term breeders.
  • Supports a broader range of livestock species beyond just rabbits and cavies, appealing to diversified small-scale farmers.
  • High release velocity with two updates in the last six months indicates active maintenance and feature refinement.

Compare WhosDue against every rival

All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.

Go deeper

The outtake for WhosDue

Strengths to defend, gaps to attack

Core Strengths

  • Offline-first architecture enables barn-floor data entry
  • One-time purchase model provides clear value over subscription-based rivals

Critical Frictions

  • $9.99 per-device cost creates friction for families
  • Weight entry fields lack metric/imperial flexibility
  • No native cloud-sync for multi-user management

Growth Levers

  • Implement family-sharing or cloud-sync to reduce multi-device friction
  • Expand breed/color databases to capture competitive show-breeder segments

Market Threats

  • Livestocked's broader species support captures diversified farmers
  • Lack of cloud-sync leaves users vulnerable to data loss upon device replacement

What are the next best moves?

highInvest

Ship cloud-based data synchronization because it is the top-requested feature → reduce multi-device purchase friction.

Cloud sync is the #1 user request and primary source of friction for multi-user households.

Trade-off: Push the pedigree genetic-projection feature to Q4 — cloud sync has 5x the user-request volume.

mediumMaintain

Expand breed and color variety lists because users report forced workarounds → improve pedigree accuracy.

Incomplete breed lists are a top-three complaint theme, forcing users to rely on notes fields.

Trade-off: Same-quarter capacity available — no major lever displaced.

A counter-intuitive read

The $9.99 one-time purchase model is a liability, not an asset, because it prevents the recurring revenue needed to fund the cloud infrastructure that power users now demand.

Feature Gaps vs Competitors

  • Multi-device cloud synchronization (available in Livestocked but missing here)
  • Multi-species livestock support (available in Livestocked but missing here)

Key Takeaways

  • The one-time purchase model is a primary retention driver, but the lack of cloud-sync is the #1 churn risk for multi-user households.
  • Expanding the breed and color database is a low-cost, high-impact move to improve pedigree accuracy for competitive breeders.

WhosDue secures its niche through a no-subscription pricing model, but the lack of multi-device sync threatens long-term retention as breeders expand their operations, so the PM must prioritize cloud-based data sharing to prevent churn to more robust livestock platforms.

Where Is It Heading?

Stable

The niche breeding management market is consolidating around tools that offer both mobile-first data entry and cloud-based collaboration. WhosDue remains stable due to its pricing, but it will face increased pressure from Livestocked as users demand more sophisticated, multi-device data management.

Lack of multi-device sync forces users to pay for multiple licenses, which creates negative sentiment and churn risk.

The one-time purchase model continues to drive positive reviews from users who reject the industry-wide subscription trend.

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by WhosDue, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

What's new

The app has clarified its pricing model and identified critical feature gaps in multi-device synchronization that are currently driving user frustration.

added

Explicit Pricing Tier

added

Multi-device Sync Complaints

improved

Feature Repositioning

shifted

Audience Expansion

Cite this report

Marlvel.ai. “WhosDue Intelligence Report.” Updated Jun 10, 2026. https://marlvel.ai/apps/com-cherokeeflats-whosdue

Agent Markdown (.md)See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0