High confidence · Latest 100 of 109 total reviews analyzed · Based on 109 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Upset
Recent user voice shows a upset sentiment. Users appreciate clear premise and design focus on safety and comfort for niche relationship dynamics, but report aggressive paywalls for basic functionality like distance filtering and messaging frustrate the user base and technical instability and frequent crashes post-update disrupt the core dating experience for active users.
Rating: 3.7
Reviews: 109
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
3.8/ 5
★★★★★
(4.5K)Current version
4.1/ 5
+0.2 vs overall
★★★★★
(3.2K)Main signal post-update: clear premise and design focus on safety and comfort for niche relationship dynamics.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Clear premise and design focus on safety and comfort for niche relationship dynamics
- “Users appreciate the clear focus on specific relationship structures”
- “The design is described as beautiful and smart by early adopters”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Aggressive paywalls for basic functionality like distance filtering and messaging frustrate the user base
- “Users report that basic distance settings are locked behind a subscription”
- “The inability to message matches without paying is a primary source of negative feedback”
- Technical instability and frequent crashes post-update disrupt the core dating experience for active users
- “Reports of white screens and app crashes during profile navigation”
- “Users note that the app lags or fails to load profiles after recent updates”
Request
Most requested
- Meaningful location and distance filters are requested to ensure matches are within a reachable range
- “Users want the ability to filter by city or state without paying”
- “The current automatic distance settings are viewed as unusable for dating”