High confidence · Latest 69 of 175 total reviews analyzed · Based on 175 reviews. Signal may be noisy.

Frustrated

Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate reselling enthusiasts find value in the treasure hunt experience provided by the app interface and convenient identification tools assist beginners in learning about antique and thrift store items, but report deceptive subscription practices and forced payment walls frustrate users during the initial setup process and inaccurate image recognition and slow search performance fail to match free competitor tool capabilities.

Rating: 4.7

Reviews: 175

Confidence: high

How did the latest release land?

Overall
4.7/ 5
(26.2K)
Current version
4.8/ 5
+0.1 vs overall
(15.5K)
Main signal post-update: reselling enthusiasts find value in the treasure hunt experience provided by the app interface.

Sentiment over time

Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.

How have ratings & review volume moved?

Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.

Rating over time

Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.

Releases:MajorMinorPatch6 releases in range

Review themes

Praise

What users love

  • Reselling enthusiasts find value in the treasure hunt experience provided by the app interface
    • Users describe the process of finding items as a rewarding treasure hunt
    • New resellers appreciate the detailed information provided for identifying potential inventory
  • Convenient identification tools assist beginners in learning about antique and thrift store items
    • Beginners report the app is helpful for learning the ropes of the reselling business
    • Users find the tool convenient for quick identification of items while shopping
Complaint

Common complaints

  • Deceptive subscription practices and forced payment walls frustrate users during the initial setup process
    • Users report being forced into subscription commitments before accessing any core features
    • Multiple reports of unexpected charges following free trials that were allegedly cancelled
  • Inaccurate image recognition and slow search performance fail to match free competitor tool capabilities
    • Users frequently compare the app unfavorably to free image search alternatives
    • Reports of the AI incorrectly identifying items as clothing regardless of the category selected
Request

Most requested

  • Transparent pricing and free access to basic search features are requested by potential users
    • Users request the ability to perform at least one free search to evaluate quality
    • Feedback suggests clear communication of subscription costs is needed before data collection

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ThriftAI: Profit Identifier, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0