High confidence · 54 reviews analyzed · Based on 54 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Recent user voice shows a upset sentiment. Users appreciate card identification accuracy provides value for users new to the hobby during initial scanning sessions, but report aggressive subscription paywalls prevent users from testing core functionality before committing to annual payments and inaccurate market value data and identification errors frustrate collectors seeking reliable pricing information.
Rating: 4.5
Reviews: 54
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Review themes
What users love
- Card identification accuracy provides value for users new to the hobby during initial scanning sessions
- “New users find the scanning capability helpful for getting started”
- “Some users report successful identification of cards that other scanners missed”
Common complaints
- Aggressive subscription paywalls prevent users from testing core functionality before committing to annual payments
- “Users report being forced into subscriptions without a functional free trial”
- “Complaints regarding unskippable payment screens blocking app access”
- Inaccurate market value data and identification errors frustrate collectors seeking reliable pricing information
- “Users report the system frequently misidentifies card sets and variants”
- “Pricing data is described as unreliable compared to manual search results”
Most requested
- Collection management tools including total portfolio value and sorting by market price are requested
- “Users want a summary view of their total collection value”
- “Requests for sorting features by price and year to organize large inventories”