SuperTrader: Trading Journal vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against SuperTrader: Trading Journal's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperTrade Like A ProKINFO ABFusion Media LimitedMetaQuotes Software Corp.TradingView
CategoryFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceFinance
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count97845236,01872,923377,626
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateDec 26, 2021Aug 13, 2017Sep 2, 2014Jan 15, 2011Apr 24, 2017
Last UpdatedApr 17, 2026Jan 15, 2026Apr 9, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--positiveexcellentmixed
Score--62/10085/10045/100
Praises--
  • Comprehensive Market Data
  • Trading Utility
  • Fast trade execution and reliable withdrawal processing drive high user trust in the platform
  • Comprehensive charting tools and indicator libraries provide high value for technical analysis enthusiasts
Complaints--
  • Technical Bugs & Stability
  • Intrusive Advertising
  • Discrepancies in chart visualization compared to legacy trading platforms cause confusion for migrating users
  • Persistent application lag and performance instability disrupt technical analysis during active trading sessions
Requests---
  • Integration of advanced market analysis tools similar to external charting platforms
  • Expanded historical data access and tick-level intervals for more precise backtesting capabilities
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Automated broker import engine reduces logging friction
  • Mental-state tracking provides differentiated psychological performance metrics
  • Verified performance data via direct broker integration functions as a trust-based moat.
  • Global data breadth (300k+ instruments)
  • Differentiated Economic Calendar utility
  • High brand authority with 1M+ ratings
  • High-performance execution engine sustains professional trust
  • MQL5 algorithmic environment creates high switching costs
  • Deep broker-server integration ensures platform ubiquity
  • Pine Script creates high switching costs
  • Social network effects drive organic acquisition
  • Proprietary charting engine outperforms desktop platforms
Weaknesses
  • Manual entry requirement for non-supported brokers
  • Pro tier at $74.99/year exceeds casual-user threshold
  • Zero revenue model creates long-term sustainability risk.
  • Lack of active execution features limits user retention.
  • Critical stability issues (crashes on launch)
  • Broken core functionality (search feature)
  • Intrusive 20-second video ads
  • Legacy interface design creates friction for new users
  • Account setup process for demo environments lacks accessibility
  • Limited native social-community features compared to modern alternatives
  • Performance lag disrupts active trading sessions
  • Aggressive monetization of standard time intervals
  • Data discrepancies reported by paid subscribers
Pricingfreemiumfreefreemiumfreefreemium
Momentum-ZombieActiveActiveActive
Update Cadence-2 versions, ~1d avg4 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~11d avg

Compare SuperTrader: Trading Journal head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by SuperTrader: Trading Journal, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0