High confidence · 50 reviews analyzed · Based on 50 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate native support for diverse archive formats provides a reliable utility for file management, but report aggressive subscription prompts appearing at the start of sessions frustrate non-paying users.
Rating: 4.2
Reviews: 50
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.2/ 5
★★★★★
(886K)Current version
1.0/ 5
-3.2 vs overall
★★★★★
(1)Main signal post-update: aggressive subscription prompts appearing at the start of sessions frustrate non-paying users.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Native support for diverse archive formats provides a reliable utility for file management
- “Users appreciate the ability to handle various compressed file types without needing external tools”
- “The software is recognized for its consistency in performing standard extraction tasks”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Aggressive subscription prompts appearing at the start of sessions frustrate non-paying users
- “Users report that monetization prompts are intrusive and difficult to dismiss”
- “The placement of subscription offers leads to accidental clicks and negative feedback”
Request
Most requested
- Editing capabilities for compressed archives would improve the utility of the mobile application
- “Users express a desire to modify files directly within archives without full extraction”
- “Requests for a one-time license fee option to mirror the desktop purchasing model”