High confidence · 99 reviews analyzed · Based on 99 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate native support for complex archive formats provides a reliable utility for power users, but report aggressive subscription prompts and small ui elements lead to accidental purchase clicks.
Rating: 3.4
Reviews: 99
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.2/ 5
★★★★★
(886.4K)Current version
3.4/ 5
-0.8 vs overall
★★★★★★
(225)Main signal post-update: aggressive subscription prompts and small UI elements lead to accidental purchase clicks.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Native support for complex archive formats provides a reliable utility for power users
- “Users value the ability to handle various compression formats without needing external tools”
- “The app is recognized as a standard utility for managing encrypted archives on mobile”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Aggressive subscription prompts and small UI elements lead to accidental purchase clicks
- “Users report frustration with subscription banners appearing at the start of every session”
- “The placement of monetization prompts is described as deceptive and difficult to navigate”
Request
Most requested
- Expanded file editing capabilities for compressed archives to avoid full extraction
- “Users request the ability to modify files directly within the archive format”