Zillow Rentals vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Zillow Rentals's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Flatfox
Contender
Roomster
Contender
Belong
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperZillow.combomnegócio.comflatfoxOnTheMarket.comADEVINTA REAL ESTATE SLURoomster Corp.Belong LLCLandlord Studio LimitedEstateSales.NETBuildingLink.com
CategoryLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleProductivityLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyle
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.0 / 54.7 / 51.5 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count387,780745267583,22620,924147211,1862,109
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateSep 6, 2012May 10, 2012Nov 17, 2015Feb 5, 2015Oct 4, 2009Mar 25, 2016Feb 7, 2022Feb 23, 2023Oct 17, 2015Feb 22, 2010
Last UpdatedMay 14, 2026May 12, 2026May 5, 2026Mar 28, 2026May 11, 2026May 17, 2026May 6, 2026Feb 10, 2026Dec 16, 2025Apr 23, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativenegativepositivenegativenegativeterriblenegativemixedmixedterrible
Score35/10025/10085/10035/10025/10015/10025/10050/10045/10020/100
Praises
  • Map-based search functionality allows users to visualize property locations relative to local amenities
  • Map-based navigation provides a highly effective visual interface for discovering real estate opportunities
-
  • Property search functionality provides a useful alternative to larger market competitors
  • The artificial intelligence search tool provides a practical way to save time during property discovery
  • Occasional positive experiences reported by a small minority of users finding the interface functional
  • Property management interface provides a centralized location for residents to track home maintenance requests
-
  • Integrated map features and photo galleries provide efficient planning for weekend estate sale treasure hunting
  • Centralized property management tools provide convenience for residents to handle common building tasks independently
Complaints
  • Prevalence of fraudulent or misleading rental listings undermines trust in the platform reliability
  • Systemic failure to apply search filters results in irrelevant property listings across the platform
  • Lack of in-app management tools forces users to rely on web portals for listing edits
-
  • Persistent unauthorized access errors force users to log in repeatedly during sessions
  • Widespread fraudulent listings and lack of verification mechanisms undermine trust in the property search experience
  • Aggressive paywalls blocking all communication features force users to pay before verifying if leads are real
  • Prevalence of bot accounts and scam listings undermines the utility of the roommate matching platform
  • Frequent application crashes during payment submission and repair requests disrupt the core user experience
  • Aggressive and non-transparent billing practices create significant financial friction for both tenants and property owners
-
  • Persistent application crashes during launch prevent access to sale listings for many mobile users
  • Persistent login failures and session timeouts force users to re-authenticate daily on mobile devices
  • Critical feature regressions and missing functionality hinder basic building operations like amenity bookings
  • Outdated user interface design and poor navigation create significant friction for daily property management tasks
Requests
  • Granular filtering options for square footage and property type to improve search precision
  • Advanced filtering options for specific property types and building features are required for efficient searching
-
  • Expanded search filters for property attributes like bathroom count and service charges
  • A dedicated reporting mechanism for fraudulent listings is needed to help users flag suspicious activity
  • Removal of mandatory subscription fees for basic messaging to allow genuine communication between potential roommates
  • Granular control over payment methods and account settings within the application interface
-
  • Advanced filtering options to exclude online auctions from search results for local in-person sales
  • Comprehensive feature parity with the web portal to enable full amenity and announcement management
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Proprietary Rent Zestimate valuation model creates high switching costs
  • Massive inventory scale provides superior property volume
  • Map-based search interface sustains high session duration
  • Map-based visual discovery drives high session frequency
  • Cross-platform sync increases multi-device switching costs
  • Broad inventory provides comprehensive market coverage
  • Direct-to-advertiser chat reduces search friction
  • Swiss-specific regulatory compliance builds local trust
  • 24-hour listing exclusivity creates a supply-side barrier
  • MyPlace collaboration features drive session frequency
  • Agent-valuation lead generation supports B2B revenue
  • 1.5M+ property inventory provides broad market coverage for long-term housing seekers.
  • High brand authority in the Spanish market sustains organic install velocity.
  • Global listing supply across 190+ countries sustains organic acquisition.
  • Manual ID validation system creates a trust barrier against low-effort spam.
  • Concierge-style service model reduces landlord labor
  • Guaranteed rent payments create a B2B distribution barrier
  • Automated rent payment loop anchors landlords to the platform
  • Receipt digitization creates high-value tax compliance habits
  • B2B liquidation network provides high-barrier supply of local sale data
  • Resident ID functions as a high-frequency daily utility for building access
  • Centralized B2B operational hub drives enterprise-wide adoption across managed properties
Weaknesses
  • High prevalence of scam listings erodes user trust
  • Persistent technical friction in identity verification blocks applications
  • Aggressive third-party contact triggers privacy-related churn
  • 0.11★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • Search filter logic failure forces manual data sifting
  • Lack of native listing management for sellers
  • Static listing format lacks virtual tours
  • Low review volume limits social proof
  • Persistent session timeouts force manual re-authentication
  • Map view interface bugs reset search results
  • Essential UI filters are often positioned off-screen
  • 0.7★ sentiment gap between search utility and listing-submission stability.
  • Lack of identity validation for advertisers drives high-volume scam complaints.
  • 0.6★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates poor platform-specific optimization.
  • Mandatory subscription for basic messaging drives high negative sentiment.
  • Frequent crashes during payment submission
  • 0.45★ rating gap between iOS and Android
  • Opaque billing practices
  • 1.5-star iOS rating indicates severe friction
  • Reliance on landlord-initiated invitations limits independent tenant adoption
  • Persistent launch crashes on the latest version
  • Persistent login failures force daily re-authentication for the majority of users
  • Missing feature parity with web portal creates functional gaps in amenity management
  • Outdated UI navigation creates friction for daily property management tasks
Pricingfreemiumfreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreesubscription
MomentumActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceIntenseMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence5 versions, ~10d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~7d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~9d avg1 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~10d avg2 versions, ~1d avg5 versions2 versions, ~84d avg2 versions, ~2d avg

Compare Zillow Rentals head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Zillow Rentals, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0