MARLVEL

Contractor Foreman vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Contractor Foreman's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Contractor Foreman
This App
Raken Construction Management
Nemesis
Bridgit Bench
Contender
CoConstruct
Peer
Buildertrend
Peer
HCSS HeavyJob: Smart job sites
Peer
Contractor+
Peer
Fleetiqo
New Kid
MyCarrier Partners
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperConstruction Contractor Services, LLCRaken, Inc.Bridgit Inc.Buildertrend Solutions, Inc.Buildertrend Solutions, Inc.Heavy Construction Systems Specialists, Inc.Contractor Plus, Inc.Pierre CARRON DE LA CARRIEREMyCarrier LLC
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityBusiness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.3 / 54.8 / 55.0 / 53.0 / 54.5 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count51121,31422204,8871421,92102
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJul 31, 2017Nov 21, 2013Jul 9, 2019May 28, 2015Mar 19, 2012Nov 21, 2013Nov 19, 2020Dec 8, 2025Sep 7, 2025
Last UpdatedMay 11, 2026May 11, 2026May 7, 2026Mar 19, 2026May 7, 2026May 7, 2026Apr 30, 2026Mar 25, 2026Feb 25, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositivepositive---terrible---
Score80/10085/100---25/100---
Praises-
  • Field-first usability
---
  • Project managers value the immediate access to field production data and crew hours
---
Complaints-
  • Connectivity issues
---
  • Frequent application crashes and login failures prevent daily field reporting tasks
  • Feature parity gaps between tablet and phone versions hinder mobile productivity
---
Requests-
  • Form customization
---
  • Search functionality for crew members and equipment is required for phone users
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • 700-topic safety library functions as a B2B distribution barrier into compliance-heavy trade partnerships
  • All-in-one suite architecture reduces software overhead for small contractors compared to specialized point solutions
  • Field-first UI design drives high adoption rates
  • Daily reporting workflow is an industry standard
  • Centralized workforce intelligence hub provides visibility for multi-project resource planning
  • AI-driven natural language queries reduce reporting friction for directors
  • Established brand authority in the high-end custom builder market
  • Deep project management heritage for complex builds
  • Financial management suite functions as a high-switching-cost B2B lock-in
  • Client and subcontractor portals create a network effect among external stakeholders
  • 21-language support functions as a B2B distribution barrier into international labor markets
  • Deep integration with HCSS enterprise suite provides superior data continuity for large-scale projects
  • Bluetooth-enabled tool tracking functions as a physical-digital barrier to entry
  • GPS-validated time clock data provides verifiable labor proof for client billing
  • Multi-currency support enables international rental operations
  • VIN decoder provides immediate utility for vehicle acquisition
  • Mobile-first shipper KPI access reduces manual sales overhead [Platform: iOS/Android]
  • AI-driven book-of-business insights provide immediate value to carrier reps [Feature: AI Insights]
Weaknesses
  • Manual field log entry creates friction compared to automated daily-reporting workflows in nemesis apps
  • Mobile UX lacks high-frequency polish required for active job site documentation
  • Missing client-facing communication portal
  • Limited customization in reporting templates
  • 0.49 rating gap between iOS and Android
  • Enterprise-only pricing model excludes mid-market firms
  • Lack of integrated field-level data capture limits daily site-management utility
  • 0.11 rating gap between Android and iOS platforms
  • Manual estimation workflows increase time-to-quote
  • Legacy mobile interface creates a user-sentiment gap vs mobile-first competitors
  • Lack of native AI-assisted estimation tools
  • 1.1-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates persistent technical debt
  • High frequency of sync failures results in repeated manual entry work for field staff
  • Dependency on QuickBooks Online for financial reporting
  • Lack of native, standalone accounting tools for non-QuickBooks users
  • No maintenance-shop network integration
  • Lacks predictive AI service advisory tools
  • Zero Android rating count indicates low adoption on the platform [Android: 0 ratings]
  • Dependency on existing TMS accounts restricts new user acquisition [Pricing: TMS-only]
Pricingsubscriptionfreemiumpaidsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-Maintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~3d avg2 versions, ~3d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~21d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~9d avg2 versions, ~0d avg-2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg

Compare Contractor Foreman head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Contractor Foreman, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0