EatLove vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against EatLove's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

EatLove
This App
Fitfat App
Contender
MunchNow
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperGYFS Inc.ALTCONNECT Sp. z o. o.Riafy Technologies Pvt. Ltd.EMCAN-TECYOUFOODZ PTY LTDEAT CLEAN LLCGood SnoozeZ's Good Vibez Juice Barkoein appsEdutainment Adventures Pvt Ltd
CategoryFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & Drink
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.4 / 54.9 / 54.4 / 50.0 / 54.8 / 52.1 / 54.3 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count41797501220127100
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 18, 2019Sep 27, 2023Feb 20, 2020Feb 16, 2022Aug 3, 2023Jul 9, 2024Jul 20, 2020Sep 7, 2024May 19, 2026May 5, 2026
Last UpdatedApr 9, 2025May 7, 2026Apr 1, 2026Mar 8, 2022May 12, 2026Oct 1, 2025Sep 29, 2021Dec 5, 2024May 19, 2026May 6, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixed----negative----
Score65/100----20/100----
Praises
  • Dietitian-curated recipe library
---------
Complaints
  • Restrictive access model
----
  • App instability and performance issues
----
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • LENA engine automates 4 million dietary factors
  • HIPAA-compliant chat enables direct clinical feedback
--
  • B2B distribution model aligns with local vendor inventory
  • Weekly menu rotation (20 new meals) sustains long-term retention
  • No-lock-in subscription model lowers the barrier to initial conversion
  • Low entry price point ($9.60/meal) captures budget-conscious users
  • Flexible subscription portal reduces friction for plan changes
-
  • Growler-refill program creates physical-digital hardware lock-in
  • Hyper-local focus enables personalized in-store service
  • Direct-to-consumer sales channel for restaurant brands
  • Gamified rewards loop increases repeat transaction frequency
  • Offline-first architecture enables consistent usage in low-connectivity environments
  • Pantry Search utility reduces planning friction for home cooks
Weaknesses
  • B2B-gated access restricts top-of-funnel growth
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates technical debt
--
  • Zero rating count across platforms
  • No consumer-facing pricing strategy
  • Lack of integrated nutrition tracking vs Thistle
  • No dietitian-reviewed plan credibility vs Fitkult
  • 2.1-star rating on iOS indicates severe service delivery failures
  • Lack of frequent release cadence leaves bugs unpatched
-
  • Zero Android rating activity indicates low adoption
  • Lack of nutritional education tools limits lifestyle-partner potential
  • No recipe discovery or inventory management features
  • Zero social or community-driven engagement mechanisms
  • Lack of clinical validation limits trust compared to dietitian-reviewed rivals
  • No direct mobile ordering integration compared to restaurant-branded competitors
Pricingsubscriptionfreefreemiumfreesubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumfreefreefreemium
MomentumZombieIntense-ZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieZombieMaintenanceZombie
Update Cadence2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg5 versions-1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~0d avg2 versions, ~38d avg5 versions2 versions, ~517d avg2 versions, ~1d avg1 versions

Compare EatLove head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by EatLove, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0