MARLVEL

@event vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against @event's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

@event
This App
Raymond James Meetings
Nemesis
BUPL Arrangementer
Contender
Dude Solutions Connect
Contender
Lumen Events
Contender
Seamless
Peer
Arrow Electronics Events
Peer
Wells Fargo Meetings & Events
Peer
Attendium: Guest list app
Peer
CWIEME Berlin
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperBI WorldwideRaymond James FinancialConference ManagerBrightly Software, Inc.CenturyLink, IncTerrapinn Holdings Pty LtdArrow Electronics, Inc.Wells FargoAttendium ABHyve Group PLC
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityBusinessEventsProductivity
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 53.6 / 53.0 / 53.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.2 / 54.2 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count12192205221140
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 9, 2015Jan 3, 2017Oct 4, 2022Apr 11, 2019Feb 17, 2022Jan 12, 2023Nov 8, 2022Jul 21, 2019Apr 23, 2011Apr 25, 2026
Last UpdatedMay 13, 2026Apr 1, 2026Apr 28, 2026Aug 27, 2020Nov 27, 2023May 8, 2026May 2, 2026Nov 26, 2025Feb 17, 2026May 7, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixednegative--------
Score65/10025/100--------
Praises-
  • The initial event registration process provides clear instructions for attendees via email communication
--------
Complaints-
  • Lack of self-service password reset functionality prevents users from accessing their event accounts
  • Absence of technical support channels leaves users stranded without assistance for login failures
--------
Requests-
  • Implementation of a password recovery or account reset feature on the login screen
--------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Secure activation-code gating [Enterprise security segment]
  • Offline data collection [Remote venue reliability]
  • Deep integration with internal Raymond James event ecosystems ensures proprietary branding consistency.
-
  • Asset lifecycle management integration functions as a B2B distribution barrier into enterprise facility partnerships
-
  • High-fidelity agenda navigation facilitates complex event schedules
  • Attendee-to-attendee networking suite drives pre-event engagement
  • Secure authentication mechanism restricts proprietary data access
---
Weaknesses
  • Missing native note-taking [User feedback]
  • 0.98★ Android-iOS rating gap [Platform parity]
  • No exportable takeaway tools [Utility deficit]
  • Critical usability failures in account recovery prevent user access.
  • Lack of technical support channels exacerbates login frustration.
-
  • Static event-only architecture limits user retention beyond the two-day training window
-
  • Zero offline functionality limits utility in high-congestion venues
  • No native badge printing integration increases on-site operational friction
  • Third-party infrastructure dependency limits custom feature development
---
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefreefreemiumfree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseZombie-IntenseMaintenanceIntenseSteady-
Update Cadence2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg2 versions, ~2d avg5 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo-2 versions, ~2d avg2 versions, ~11d avg5 versions5 versions-

Compare @event head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by @event, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0