High confidence · Latest 73 of 289 total reviews analyzed
Upset
Recent user voice shows a upset sentiment. Users appreciate high quality motoring journalism and photography remain the primary reasons for long-term subscriber loyalty, but report frequent application crashes and launch failures prevent access to paid content across multiple mobile devices and digital edition format changes to static scans make reading articles difficult on mobile screen sizes.
Rating: 3.3
Reviews: 289
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
2.8/ 5
★★★★★
(1.1K)Current version
4.7/ 5
+1.9 vs overall
★★★★★★
(306)Main signal post-update: high quality motoring journalism and photography remain the primary reasons for long-term subscriber loyalty.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Not enough recent reviews to plot a sentiment trend.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- High quality motoring journalism and photography remain the primary reasons for long-term subscriber loyalty
- “Readers consistently praise the expert writing and visual quality of the magazine content”
- “Long-term subscribers express deep appreciation for the editorial standards despite technical frustrations”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Frequent application crashes and launch failures prevent access to paid content across multiple mobile devices
- “Users report the app closes immediately upon launch or during content loading”
- “Persistent stability issues are cited across both Android and iOS platforms”
- Digital edition format changes to static scans make reading articles difficult on mobile screen sizes
- “Subscribers complain that the shift from interactive layouts to scanned pages degrades the reading experience”
- “Users note that text is unreadable without functional zoom capabilities on smaller displays”
Request
Most requested
- Return to interactive digital layouts instead of static scanned pages for better mobile readability
- “Users explicitly request the restoration of the previous interactive article format”
- “Readers highlight that the current scanned format is unsuitable for digital consumption”