High confidence · Latest 75 of 81 total reviews analyzed · Based on 81 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate food scanning functionality provides significant utility for tracking daily nutritional intake and progress, but report inaccurate ai food recognition and lack of manual editing tools frustrate users seeking precision.
Rating: 4.5
Reviews: 81
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.5/ 5
★★★★★★
(5.6K)Current version
4.7/ 5
+0.2 vs overall
★★★★★★
(926)Main signal post-update: food scanning functionality provides significant utility for tracking daily nutritional intake and progress.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Not enough recent reviews to plot a sentiment trend.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Rating over time
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Food scanning functionality provides significant utility for tracking daily nutritional intake and progress
- “Users highlight the food scanning tool as a primary driver for their weight loss success”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Inaccurate AI food recognition and lack of manual editing tools frustrate users seeking precision
- “Users report the AI frequently misidentifies food items and prevents manual corrections”
Request
Most requested
- Manual override functionality for food logs and nutrition data to ensure logging accuracy
- “Users request the ability to fix incorrect AI-generated nutrition information”