Fertilizer Calc App vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Fertilizer Calc App's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

TankMix
Contender
SpraySelect
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperAlberto GiamboneTapLogic, LLCCorteva, Inc.Valmont Industries, Inc.TeeJet TechnologiesNSW Department of Primary IndustriesAgro BASFSyngenta Digital LTDATaranisFlyPard
CategoryUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesBusinessBusinessBusinessUtilitiesUtilitiesBusinessBusiness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating1.0 / 53.3 / 55.0 / 53.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count124651011221
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 27, 2019Sep 16, 2011Jan 12, 2010Aug 27, 2017Apr 30, 2012Oct 12, 2014Apr 24, 2018May 6, 2021Jan 29, 2021Jun 8, 2021
Last UpdatedJul 18, 2025Apr 15, 2022May 4, 2017Mar 11, 2021Apr 6, 2026Jan 18, 2018Aug 8, 2024Apr 16, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 15, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-------excellent--
Score-------90/100--
Praises-------
  • The application provides a highly satisfying experience for agricultural management and simulation enthusiasts
--
Complaints----------
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Flexible unit-conversion system supports diverse international farming standards
  • Elemental nutrient focus differentiates from generic chemical mixers
  • 14,000+ chemical database functions as a comprehensive reference moat
  • Offline sync capability ensures utility in remote field environments
  • Scientific reliability of thousands of tested combinations
  • Direct laboratory access for custom mixability requests
  • Specialized focus on YaraVita chemical compatibility
  • Trusted Valmont brand ensures reliability for critical irrigation infrastructure
  • Brand-agnostic utility lowers entry barrier for non-Valley hardware owners
  • Hardware-specific recommendation engine drives direct TeeJet equipment adoption
  • Search settings persistence reduces re-calculation time for repeat applications
  • Government-backed authority establishes immediate trust with producers
  • Specialized drought-specific logic provides high-utility decision support
  • Hyper-localized Baltic climate database provides a regional barrier to entry
  • Free utility model reduces friction for farmer adoption
  • Syngenta ecosystem integration provides enterprise-grade support for large-scale operations
  • Quick-action notifications reduce friction in alert management
  • AI-powered threat identification functions as a technical moat against manual scouting.
  • Geospatial mapping integration centralizes field-level decision support.
  • Cloud-based architecture supports complex business intelligence beyond simple price tracking
  • MyJohnDeere integration creates a B2B distribution barrier into commercial farm operations
  • Automated multi-year field potential zones provide high-fidelity data that manual calculators cannot match
Weaknesses
  • 1-star rating on iOS indicates critical usability regressions
  • Manual data entry requirements create high friction for professional users
  • No offline mode limits utility in remote field environments
  • 2.69 rating on Android indicates significant UX friction
  • No major feature updates since 2022 on iOS
  • Manual entry flow is slower than hardware-integrated rivals
  • No significant feature updates since 2017
  • Lack of in-app field logging
  • Static database search UX
  • Zero remote communication with irrigation hardware
  • Static feature set lacks real-time field data integration
  • 1.89-point Android-iOS rating gap indicates inconsistent cross-platform performance
  • Lack of offline synchronization limits utility in remote field environments
  • No updates since 2018
  • Lack of offline mode limits utility in remote areas
  • Zero integration with farm machinery or procurement platforms
  • Manual advisory lookup is slower than AI-automated field health monitoring
  • 0.0 rating on Android platform
  • No offline-first architecture for remote field usage
  • Lacks prescriptive agronomic intelligence
  • Lack of market-trend data forces users to switch apps for financial decision-making.
  • No remote equipment control limits the app to monitoring rather than active management.
  • Zero user reviews on Android and single-review status on iOS suggest low community engagement
  • Lack of real-time market data forces users to switch apps for daily financial checks
  • No integrated commodity price forecasting to optimize selling windows
Pricingfreemiumfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceZombieZombieZombieMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~202d avg5 versions, ~307d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~1308d avg2 versions, ~959d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~22d avg2 versions, ~1191d avg5 versions, ~93d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~0d avg

Compare Fertilizer Calc App head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Fertilizer Calc App, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0