Field of View Calculator vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Field of View Calculator's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

NEB Tools
Nemesis
Buffers
Contender
Gasdruck
Contender
LabCal
Contender
GelApp
Peer
AI Lab
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperApogee InstrumentsNew England Biolabs IncAkkyra SystemsLars BergeltiSheepSoftPylyp ChernovSamuel GanSwift Management AGSamuel GanSi-Ware Systems
CategoryBusinessReferenceUtilitiesUtilitiesReferenceUtilitiesMedicalUtilitiesProductivityDeveloper Tools
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 53.9 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 51.9 / 54.8 / 54.0 / 53.3 / 51.0 / 51.0 / 5
Ratings Count1800764321
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$2.99Free
Release DateApr 4, 2015Jan 15, 2010Feb 25, 2009Feb 2, 2024Feb 14, 2019Feb 2, 2020Apr 22, 2015Apr 11, 2018Nov 26, 2018Nov 11, 2021
Last UpdatedFeb 27, 2026May 1, 2026Dec 27, 2022Feb 2, 2024May 17, 2022Apr 8, 2026Jan 22, 2016Apr 21, 2020Nov 26, 2018Apr 12, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixed-negative-negativepositivemixed---
Score30/100-40/100-20/10085/10060/100---
Praises
  • Calculation shortcuts provide significant time savings for users performing repetitive mathematical tasks within the application
-
  • The application provides a convenient and accessible interface for basic chemistry training tasks
--
  • Simple and accessible interface design allows users to navigate core functions without unnecessary friction
  • Developer responsiveness and positive community interaction foster a sense of goodwill among the user base
  • Convenience of on-the-go analysis
---
Complaints
  • Critical UI layout failures cause buttons to render off screen on high resolution Android devices
  • Instructional content is either missing or fails to respond to user interaction following the latest update
-
  • Limited selection of buffer solutions restricts utility for advanced chemistry research applications
  • Functional failures in printing and email export features prevent effective data sharing
--
  • System default dark mode implementation renders typed text invisible during standard usage on mobile devices
  • Difficulty with non-scanner images
---
Requests--
  • Expansion of the buffer library and addition of custom buffer entry capabilities
--
  • Independent dark theme toggle within the application settings to override system default display behaviors
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Proprietary hardware integration functions as a technical barrier to entry for non-Apogee sensor users
  • Authoritative biological data repository functions as a high-trust barrier to entry
  • Deep integration with NEB reagent catalog drives B2B sales
  • Regular content updates ensure data accuracy for experimental planning
  • Proprietary algorithm provides superior calculation accuracy
  • Portable reference library enables bench-side utility
  • Seven-language interface expands potential user base across international academic markets
  • Slider-controlled SI-prefix interface provides a tactile, rapid input method for dilution tasks.
  • Open-source codebase enables community-led verification and trust
  • Minimalist UI reduces cognitive load for students
  • Automated Gabor-filter detection reduces human error
  • Self-contained architecture enables offline analysis
  • Privacy-first design via on-device CoreML processing
  • Offline-first processing engine enables field use without internet connectivity
  • Specialized focus on colony counting provides a streamlined workflow for microbiologists
-
Weaknesses
  • UI layout regressions on high-resolution Android devices
  • Broken help documentation post-update
  • 3.875 rating indicates friction in the user experience
  • Lack of cloud-save or recipe export limits utility in team settings
  • Interface relies on manual text entry rather than modern slider-based inputs
  • Non-functional export features prevent data sharing
  • Rigid 42-buffer library limits professional research utility
  • Lack of support channels prevents bug resolution
  • Zero rating count and no updates since early 2024
  • 1.86-star rating indicates critical reliability issues.
  • No updates since May 2022.
  • Lacks automated chemical formula parsing.
  • System-wide dark mode implementation breaks text visibility
  • Zero monetization model limits long-term development capacity
  • Zero-update cadence since 2016
  • Manual override requirement for mobile photos
  • Zero updates since 2020 creates technical debt
  • 3.33 rating indicates poor performance on current hardware
  • 1.0-star rating baseline indicates severe usability or technical failures
  • No updates since 2018 release date
  • $2.99 price point lacks perceived value without active maintenance
-
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefreepaidfree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenance--ZombieMaintenanceZombieZombieZombieIntense
Update Cadence2 versions, ~226d avg1 versions--1 versions2 versions, ~225d avg1 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo1 versions5 versions

Compare Field of View Calculator head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Field of View Calculator, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0