ForceDecks vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against ForceDecks's closest competitors: identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

ForceDecks
This App
FormGuru
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperVald Performance Pty LtdSquats and ScienceSawyer BlankenshipPeter j AndersenR3R LLCPerFIcT Inc.dongledanCHASE PLACE LLCMurugan AmbigapathyVale Soluções Digitais
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessSports
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroidiOSiOSAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.3 / 53.6 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count316205325600
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$2.49$0.99FreeFree
Release DateMay 25, 2021Feb 11, 2020Jan 13, 2026Apr 21, 2022Jul 21, 2025Apr 28, 2026Feb 23, 2025Sep 18, 2012Apr 6, 2026Jan 19, 2026
Last UpdatedJul 1, 2026May 1, 2026May 27, 2026Nov 19, 2024Apr 1, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 4, 2026Apr 20, 2026Apr 6, 2026Jan 21, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment----------
Score----------
Praises----------
Complaints----------
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Proprietary dual-plate hardware creates high switching costs for clinical teams
  • Automated movement detection reduces manual analysis time
  • VALD Hub integration centralizes historical data for enterprise-level reporting
  • Proprietary 3D motion tracker integration provides high-fidelity velocity data
  • Personalized load/velocity curve generation creates a technical barrier for manual logging apps
  • Direct hardware-software integration optimizes grip-specific training protocols
  • Low barrier to entry for single-purpose tool users
  • 3D motion tracking via Face ID sensors provides high-fidelity movement data without external hardware
  • Audio-overlay capture allows users to maintain PR playlists during recording
  • Expert-led programming replaces physical gym class schedules
  • AI-powered scaling adapts to home-gym equipment constraints
  • Professional-grade coaching layer provides daily stimulus targets
-----
Weaknesses
  • Proprietary hardware requirement limits market reach to professional teams
  • No mobile-only entry tier for individual athletes
  • High price floor compared to velocity-based rivals
  • Hardware-dependent model restricts user acquisition
  • No AI-driven workout suggestions compared to Liftr
  • 3.56-star rating on iOS suggests friction in the user experience
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user demand
  • Siloed data prevents integration with broader fitness ecosystems
  • No monetization model identified in current build
  • Manual recording triggers create friction compared to automated alternatives
  • Lack of objective velocity tracking limits appeal to advanced powerlifters
  • Premium tier at $39.00/month above category median
  • No built-in social accountability features
  • Limited to the ELEMENT program rather than full library
-----
Pricingsubscriptionfreefreefreesubscriptionfreepaidpaidfreefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenance-----
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, ~9d avg1 versions1 versions1 versions-----

Compare ForceDecks head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ForceDecks, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0