搭把手回收 vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against 搭把手回收's closest competitors: identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Qiyadat
New Kid
ZuruHomes
New Kid
Core Identity
Developer婷婷 乔Weblink .In Pvt LtdSouthern Metropolitan Regional CouncilHadaf SolutionsKarlstads kommunDmytro KukharevEmcankote developers
CategoryLifestyleBusinessLifestyleShoppingLifestyleLifestyleShoppingHouse & Home
PlatformiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 50.0 / 54.0 / 51.6 / 52.3 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count00156000
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateSep 27, 2018Sep 4, 2020Jan 28, 2016Nov 29, 2019Jun 14, 2011Aug 11, 2022May 12, 2026Feb 18, 2026
Last UpdatedJun 29, 2026Sep 5, 2020May 7, 2025Jul 21, 2025Sep 13, 2023May 5, 2026May 21, 2026Feb 20, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--negativenegative----
Score--25/10030/100----
Praises--
  • Detailed recycling information provides clarity for users navigating complex waste disposal guidelines
  • The core concept of the application provides a unique and engaging experience for users
----
Complaints--
  • Location-based search functionality fails to return relevant council recycling facility data
  • Outdated collection schedules and bin system information cause confusion for local residents
  • Critical registration and sign up failures prevent new users from accessing the core application
  • Application instability and functional regressions render the software unusable for many active users
----
Requests--
  • Calendar integration for waste collection reminders would improve utility for daily household management
-----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Personalized QR-code system simplifies user identification for recurring collection services
  • Integrated loyalty marketplace allows immediate redemption of recycling points for tangible goods
-
  • Regional council partnership provides exclusive access to local waste data
  • Simplified 'Which Bin' decision-making flow reduces cognitive load for residents
  • Educational tone lowers entry barriers for sustainability beginners
-
  • Gamified reward architecture incentivizes recycling behavior
  • B2B data model aligns with EU waste law compliance
  • Staff-specific booking creates personal stylist relationships
  • Educational content provides a unique value-add beyond simple scheduling
-
Weaknesses
  • Lack of transparent digital weighing features reduces user trust in material-value assessment
  • No automated bin-day reminders limits utility for municipal waste scheduling
-
  • Persistent application freezes during setup block core utility
  • Location-based search fails to return facility results
  • Outdated collection schedules erode user trust
  • Critical registration bugs block 100% of new user entry
  • 1.6-star rating reflects severe functional instability
-
  • Manual sticker-scanning creates high user friction
  • Zero user ratings indicate low adoption
  • Physical verification bottleneck limits scalability
  • No integrated payment processing
  • 0-rating baseline on both platforms
  • No explicit monetization strategy
-
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefree
MomentumMaintenance-MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-
Update Cadence1 versions-2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~11d avg5 versions2 versions, ~0d avg3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~7d avg-

Compare 搭把手回收 head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by 搭把手回收, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0