High confidence · 86 reviews analyzed · Based on 86 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Upset
Recent user voice shows a upset sentiment. Users appreciate simple and effective gimbal control features provide value for beginners when the connection remains stable and absence of intrusive advertisements creates a cleaner experience for users compared to other utility apps, but report frequent application crashes and pairing failures prevent basic gimbal operation across multiple mobile device models and inaccurate ai face and object tracking causes erratic gimbal movement and poor framing during video capture.
Rating: 2.6
Reviews: 86
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
2.8/ 5
★★★★★
(1.5K)Current version
2.5/ 5
-0.3 vs overall
★★★★★★
(79)Main signal post-update: frequent application crashes and pairing failures prevent basic gimbal operation across multiple mobile device models.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Simple and effective gimbal control features provide value for beginners when the connection remains stable
- “Users appreciate the basic functionality for controlling gimbal movement”
- “The app is described as useful for beginners when it successfully pairs with the hardware”
- Absence of intrusive advertisements creates a cleaner experience for users compared to other utility apps
- “Positive feedback regarding the lack of ads within the interface”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Frequent application crashes and pairing failures prevent basic gimbal operation across multiple mobile device models
- “Users report the app closes immediately upon opening or fails to detect the hardware”
- “Bluetooth connectivity drops frequently during active recording sessions”
- Inaccurate AI face and object tracking causes erratic gimbal movement and poor framing during video capture
- “Tracking features often follow the wrong subjects or fail to maintain proper vertical alignment”
- “Users complain that the AI centers heads in a way that cuts off the rest of the frame”
- Artificial software limitations on video resolution and frame rate prevent users from utilizing full camera capabilities
- “Users express frustration that the app restricts recording to lower frame rates despite hardware support for higher settings”
- “Lack of native camera integration forces users to accept lower quality output than their phone sensors allow”
Request
Most requested
- Native camera integration and higher frame rate support are required to improve professional video quality
- “Requests for 60fps recording and 4K resolution support to match modern smartphone capabilities”
- “Users ask for the ability to use native camera apps to bypass current software limitations”