Gimbal Pro vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Gimbal Pro's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Gimbal Pro
This App
Camera Remote
Contender
TargetIR
Contender
Core Identity
Developer婷婷 乔Blackmagic Design IncApplePTZOptics恒茂 刘Wuhan Guide Infrared Co.,Ltd.FoxfortMobileMoment Inc.Oleg KanDavid Quiles
CategoryUtilitiesPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoUtilitiesPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating2.5 / 52.5 / 54.0 / 53.9 / 54.5 / 53.6 / 53.8 / 54.3 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count7925691710254323151,004
PriceFreeFreeFreeFree$7.99FreeFree$9.99Free$3.99
Release DateMar 17, 2018Jun 22, 2017Jun 18, 2019Oct 4, 2022Dec 24, 2021Aug 27, 2021Jan 2, 2021Nov 14, 2025Dec 12, 2020Dec 14, 2012
Last UpdatedDec 16, 2025Sep 21, 2023Dec 12, 2025May 12, 2026Apr 27, 2026May 12, 2026Apr 19, 2026May 18, 2026Oct 31, 2024Mar 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterriblenegativemixedmixedterrible--mixedpositive-
Score25/10025/10060/10065/10020/100--45/10085/100-
Praises
  • Simple and effective gimbal control features provide value for beginners when the connection remains stable
  • Absence of intrusive advertisements creates a cleaner experience for users compared to other utility apps
  • External drive recognition on the iPad version provides useful storage management for professional workflows
  • Native integration
  • Specialized PTZ-specific workflow
  • Basic remote control functionality provides utility for users who successfully navigate the initial pairing process
--
  • Natural processing mode provides film-like aesthetic results without requiring complex post-production editing workflows
  • Offline reliability
-
Complaints
  • Frequent application crashes and pairing failures prevent basic gimbal operation across multiple mobile device models
  • Inaccurate AI face and object tracking causes erratic gimbal movement and poor framing during video capture
  • Artificial software limitations on video resolution and frame rate prevent users from utilizing full camera capabilities
  • Feature parity gaps between the iPhone and iPad versions frustrate users expecting consistent camera control
  • Connection failures with camera hardware prevent basic remote operation after recent firmware updates
  • Lack of manual controls
  • Connectivity instability
  • Persistent connection failures between the mobile application and camera hardware prevent basic image transfer tasks
  • Opaque and non-intuitive connection procedures force users to manually manage complex network settings every session
  • Recent updates introduce new bugs that degrade the stability of previously functional image transfer workflows
--
  • Critical failure to save captured media to the device library causes significant user frustration
--
Requests
  • Native camera integration and higher frame rate support are required to improve professional video quality
  • Native iPhone support is requested to allow for mobile camera control and remote operation
  • Advanced camera settings
  • Cloud-based backup features
  • Background image transfer support is needed to improve the efficiency of mobile photography workflows
--
  • Integration of remote control functionality via wearable devices for solo photography and video sessions
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Lightweight interface reduces cognitive load for casual users
  • Absence of intrusive ads creates a clean, focused utility experience
  • Proprietary Bluetooth protocol locks users into Blackmagic hardware
  • DaVinci Resolve cloud integration creates a closed-loop production workflow
  • Native Apple Watch integration provides low-friction experience
  • Zero-cost barrier to entry secures default status
  • Volunteer Mode restricts UI access for multi-user environments
  • RTMP streaming eliminates external hardware requirements
  • Location tagging metadata integration functions as a system-level differentiator for Ricoh/Pentax users
  • Specialized GR-series workflow optimization provides utility that generic photo apps lack
  • Proprietary hardware-to-mobile protocol enables low-latency thermal streaming
  • Ballistic data management creates professional-user lock-in
-
  • Ecosystem network effects driven by native lens and case integration
  • Professional-grade monitoring tools reduce post-production time
  • Offline-first architecture enables reliable usage in remote locations without cellular service
  • Incident-metering precision functions as a B2B-adjacent barrier for film-camera users
  • Lens Memory library creates high switching costs via user-specific data
  • Exposure Data Extraction reinforces the app as a permanent creative workflow fixture
Weaknesses
  • 2.6-star average rating across 1,533 ratings
  • Persistent crash-on-open failures across multiple devices
  • Lack of 4K and 60fps recording support
  • 0.7★ rating gap between platforms
  • Persistent connection failures with current firmware
  • Lack of native iPhone support
  • No manual control suite for professional videographers
  • Zero feature updates since 2019
  • 3.96 rating indicates inconsistent reliability
  • 3.94 rating indicates connectivity instability
  • No cloud-save functionality for camera configurations
  • Persistent connection failures render the app non-functional for a large portion of the user base
  • Manual network configuration requirements create significant friction for non-technical users
  • iOS price point of $7.99 creates a value disparity vs the free Android build
  • 2.8★ Android rating indicates persistent stability issues
  • Lack of cloud-sync forces manual file management
  • No social-sharing integration limits organic discovery
-
  • Critical media-saving failures reported in reviews
  • Sluggish launch times on modern devices
  • $9.99 price point lacks recurring support infrastructure
  • Ad-supported model lacks premium tiers, limiting revenue potential compared to category peers
  • Premium tier at $3.99 above category median for casual users
  • Android version lacks feature parity with iOS build
  • Zero rating count on Android platform
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreemiumfreefreepaidfreefreemium
MomentumMaintenanceIntenseZombieMaintenanceActiveActive-ActiveMaintenanceIntense
Update Cadence2 versions, ~105d avg5 versions1 versions1 versions5 versions, ~33d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~3d avg-3 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~37d avg5 versions, ~462d avg5 versions

Compare Gimbal Pro head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Gimbal Pro, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0