High confidence · Latest 61 of 156 total reviews analyzed · Based on 156 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Upset
Recent user voice shows a upset sentiment. Users appreciate core lighting control functionality provides value when the connection remains stable during initial setup, but report persistent bluetooth connection failures prevent users from controlling lights during professional production sessions and mandatory account registration and verification codes create significant friction for users attempting basic remote control.
Rating: 2.2
Reviews: 156
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
2.0/ 5
★★★★★
(532)Current version
2.3/ 5
+0.3 vs overall
★★★★★★
(3)Main signal post-update: core lighting control functionality provides value when the connection remains stable during initial setup.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Core lighting control functionality provides value when the connection remains stable during initial setup
- “Users appreciate the ability to manage multiple lights from a single interface”
- “Initial pairing and scene setup are described as effective when the connection holds”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Persistent Bluetooth connection failures prevent users from controlling lights during professional production sessions
- “Users report frequent inability to reconnect to lights after initial pairing”
- “Devices often show as offline despite being physically present and powered on”
- Mandatory account registration and verification codes create significant friction for users attempting basic remote control
- “Verification codes fail to arrive via email or SMS during the sign-up process”
- “Users express frustration at being unable to access hardware without an account”
Request
Most requested
- Ability to save custom lighting presets for specific color temperatures and brightness requirements
- “Users request the ability to store custom Kelvin settings beyond default options”