MARLVEL

HSIScare for Patients vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against HSIScare for Patients's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

HSIScare for Patients
This App
FIKA
Peer
GroundGame Health
Peer
VisionAssist+
Peer
myRemote App
Peer
GotCGM Watchface Digital
New Kid
GotCGM Watchface Analog
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperJABATAN DIGITAL NEGARA (JDN)Andre De LuccaGroundGameHealthCoding Minds, Inc.Sivantos Pte. Ltd.Gluroo Imaginations Inc.Gluroo Imaginations Inc.
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessMedicalHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 55.0 / 53.7 / 55.0 / 53.7 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count01321500
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 6, 2024Dec 12, 2025Nov 18, 2025Oct 5, 2023Jan 13, 2021Jan 29, 2026Jan 29, 2026
Last UpdatedApr 22, 2026Apr 24, 2026Mar 4, 2026Jun 25, 2025Mar 31, 2026Jan 29, 2026Jan 30, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-excellentmixed----
Score-90/10050/100----
Praises-
  • Comprehensive wellness feature set allows users to manage health goals within one application
  • Simple navigation patterns make the wellness tracking tools accessible for daily user interaction
  • Broad hardware integration support connects wellness data across most personal electronic devices
-----
Complaints-------
Requests-------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Digital audit trail functionality provides administrative verification for clinical history
  • Community Crew system drives retention via social network effects
  • Smart Planner centralizes daily utility to increase session frequency
  • Implify platform facilitates multi-party health plan and provider coordination
  • B2B contract model secures distribution through managed care organizations
  • AI-powered object description provides immediate utility for daily navigation
  • Free-to-use model lowers the barrier to entry for new users
---
Weaknesses
  • Zero rating count on both iOS and Android platforms indicates low user adoption
  • Zero-revenue model lacks monetization gates
  • 0-rating on Android platform indicates low market penetration
  • 3.67-star rating on iOS indicates early-stage UX friction
  • Zero Android review activity suggests low user adoption outside of pilot programs
  • No HIPAA-compliant architecture limits use in clinical settings
  • Lack of monetization model threatens long-term feature development
---
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombie---
Update Cadence2 versions, ~75d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~2d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~643d avg---

Compare HSIScare for Patients head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by HSIScare for Patients, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0