iLivestock Software vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against iLivestock Software's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Bego
Contender
CrewLog MX
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperDuradiamond SoftwareRanchr Software LLCBreedr LimitedBego AgriTechHerd Boss LLCTractorPal, LLCAdam FootMJICCSCARLOS CANE AREVALOJonathan Curtis
CategoryProductivityBusinessProductivityBusinessBusinessProductivityDeveloper ToolsBusinessProductivityProductivity
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating3.0 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 54.6 / 54.2 / 51.0 / 53.0 / 52.6 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count86741095812801
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMay 15, 2013Jun 21, 2017Dec 27, 2018Jan 12, 2024Apr 25, 2015Mar 20, 2017Jan 26, 2024Apr 20, 2009May 11, 2026Apr 28, 2026
Last UpdatedJun 3, 2026Apr 3, 2026May 12, 2026May 17, 2026Apr 7, 2026Apr 16, 2026Apr 2, 2026May 3, 2026May 11, 2026May 2, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedmixed--positivemixed-mixed-excellent
Score50/10065/100--75/10045/100-65/100-100/100
Praises-
  • Simple and intuitive cattle management interface facilitates daily record keeping for small herd owners
  • Responsive customer support team provides helpful assistance for users encountering technical issues or questions
--
  • Mobile record keeping for livestock management provides significant utility for farmers working in the barn
  • Customizable maintenance tracking for diverse equipment types provides significant utility for farm and garden management
-
  • Professional pilot support team provides rapid and helpful responses to technical inquiries
--
Complaints-
  • Inconsistent data persistence and synchronization errors lead to lost notes and missing animal records
  • Restricted data entry options prevent accurate tracking of complex herd management scenarios like twins
--
  • Application crashes during animal data entry prevent consistent record keeping on specific older mobile hardware
  • Subscription synchronization failures prevent users from accessing paid features after completing the purchase process
  • Data loss incidents following updates or re-sign-in events destroy years of accumulated equipment maintenance history
-
  • Application instability and launch failures following recent updates cause significant data access concerns
--
Requests-
  • Advanced herd filtering and summary reporting tools are needed to manage large-scale operations
--
  • Expanded species support for goats and pigs would increase the utility for diversified farm operations
  • Expanded tracking capabilities for fuel consumption and operational costs would improve maintenance effectiveness
-
  • Standardized flight time display formats using decimals to match traditional pilot logbook requirements
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Bluetooth hardware integration functions as a distribution moat
  • Offline-first architecture ensures utility in remote field environments
  • Offline-first architecture sustains utility in remote pastures
  • Multi-user permissions enable team-based ranch management
  • Bluetooth hardware integration with Tru-Test and Gallagher creates high switching costs.
  • Offline-first architecture ensures data continuity in remote ranching environments.
-
  • Bluetooth LE hardware integration creates high switching costs for professional breeders
  • Offline-first architecture ensures utility in remote agricultural zones
  • Shareable report generation functions as a B2B referral surface for mechanics and buyers
  • Customizable maintenance alerts drive daily active habit
-
  • Regulatory compliance (EASA/FAA) increases switching costs
  • Roster integration reduces daily entry friction
  • Cross-platform sync centralizes user data
  • Offline-first architecture ensures data access during flight deck operations
  • Localized pay-tracking logic captures specific airline contract requirements
  • AI-powered nameplate scanning reduces manual entry friction
  • Pro Web Dashboard enables multi-site portfolio management
Weaknesses
  • 3.0-star rating across 8 reviews indicates low user satisfaction
  • Lack of cloud-native multi-user dashboard limits commercial scalability
  • Data-sync failures erode user trust
  • Rigid entry menus limit tracking of complex herd scenarios
  • List-based tracking lacks visual spatial awareness compared to competitors.
  • Enterprise-only pricing creates conversion barriers for mid-sized producers.
-
  • App crashes on older Android hardware erode trust
  • Manual sync requirements for multi-user accounts interrupt field workflows
  • Subscription sync failures post-purchase
  • Data loss incidents following updates
  • High price point for non-commercial users
-
  • High cumulative subscription cost vs one-time alternatives
  • Application instability post-update
  • 2.6★ rating on iOS
  • Reliance on PDF parsing creates potential for data entry errors
  • Absence of web dashboard limits multi-platform management utility
  • No offline GPS mapping for remote field use
  • 0-rating on Android platform indicates lack of adoption
Pricingfreefreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreesubscriptionsubscriptionfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-MaintenanceMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceZombieMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~5d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~2d avg2 versions, ~1d avg-2 versions, ~29d avg2 versions, ~0d avg5 versions2 versions, ~168d avg1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg

Compare iLivestock Software head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by iLivestock Software, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0