Low confidence · 27 reviews analyzed
Thrilled
Recent user voice shows a thrilled sentiment. Users appreciate offline access to botanical data allows field identification in remote areas without cellular connectivity, but report lack of national distribution maps limits utility for users located in states adjacent to minnesota.
Rating: 4.8
Reviews: 27
Confidence: low
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.8/ 5
★★★★★
(367)Current version
4.8/ 5
0.0 vs overall
★★★★★
(367)Main signal post-update: offline access to botanical data allows field identification in remote areas without cellular connectivity.
Limited review volume (27 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.