iRaceWeigh vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against iRaceWeigh's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

iRaceWeigh
This App
Core Identity
DeveloperIntercompLongacre Racing ProductsSportsgroundRacelogicAutosport LabsSportsgroundRaceBox Motorsport LlcFTLapps LLCSpeedway Motorsports, IncSPIDER SERVICE SRL
CategorySportsUtilitiesSportsSportsSportsSportsEntertainmentSportsSportsSports
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating3.0 / 50.0 / 54.3 / 53.7 / 54.0 / 54.0 / 53.6 / 54.4 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count2066941681,2570
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$19.99FreeFree
Release DateApr 6, 2011Jul 19, 2023Apr 14, 2020Mar 14, 2016Feb 2, 2017Jun 28, 2023Jul 13, 2020Jul 17, 2012Mar 13, 2012Feb 8, 2026
Last UpdatedJan 16, 2026Jul 19, 2023Dec 1, 2025Nov 4, 2025Jan 3, 2026May 5, 2026Apr 22, 2026Feb 5, 2025Apr 29, 2026May 5, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixed--mixed--negativenegativenegative-
Score55/100--45/100--35/10025/10025/100-
Praises
  • Manual corner weight recording provides a convenient way to track vehicle setup changes at the track
--
  • The application provides a reliable tool for positioning cameras before recording track sessions
--
  • High-precision GPS tracking provides accurate lap times and sector splits for track enthusiasts
  • Dashboard view provides granular split time data across multiple track sectors for performance analysis
  • The light show feature provides an engaging and memorable experience for attendees during race events
-
Complaints
  • Frequent application crashes and forced closures disrupt the user experience during data entry sessions
--
  • Hardware connectivity failures prevent users from establishing a link with mobile devices
--
  • Frequent application crashes during startup and session recording prevent reliable data logging
  • Inaccurate GPS tracking and slow application performance degrade the utility of the lap timer
  • Lack of consistent maintenance and compatibility updates creates a poor experience for paying users
  • Persistent application crashes and login failures prevent users from accessing purchased event tickets on race day
-
Requests
  • Expanded data entry fields for suspension geometry would improve utility for professional race car setups
-----
  • Offline mode functionality to remove mandatory account login for trackside operations
-
  • Offline access to digital tickets is required to ensure entry when venue network connectivity fails
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Proprietary hardware integration creates high switching costs for existing Intercomp users.
  • Proprietary hardware-app integration creates a direct path to data management for existing customers.
-
  • Hardware-locked utility forces brand loyalty
  • HDMI configuration reduces professional support overhead
  • CAN bus integration provides deep vehicle telemetry
  • Podium platform enables remote team analysis
-
  • High-precision GPS timing accuracy
  • Proprietary hardware-software integration
  • 1,500+ circuit database
  • 270+ track library creates high switching costs
  • Raw data export appeals to technical power users
  • Stadium-integrated light show drives high-value attendee engagement
  • Localized venue-specific navigation maps reduce on-site friction
  • Lightweight UX optimized for race weekend scheduling
  • Localized timezone conversion for global race events
Weaknesses
  • Frequent application crashes during data entry sessions erode the core utility for trackside users.
  • Zero rating count on iOS and Android platforms suggests low user adoption.
-
  • Connectivity failures on modern mobile hardware
  • No cloud-save functionality for configuration profiles
  • WiFi-only connection process creates setup friction
  • No native iOS widget support
-
  • Frequent startup crashes
  • Mandatory online login for trackside use
  • Limited tablet/landscape support
  • $19.99 price point exceeds category median for unstable tools
  • GPS signal interference reported by riders
  • 3.61 rating on Android vs 4.86 on iOS indicates stability gaps
  • Persistent ticket-access failures during race days
  • Premium tier gating essential weather radar data
  • No existing user rating history for social proof
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefreemiumpaidfreefreemium
MomentumMaintenanceZombie-MaintenanceZombieIntenseMaintenanceZombie-Maintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~7d avg2 versions, ~131d avg-2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo5 versions2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~347d avg-1 versions, 1 majors/6mo

Compare iRaceWeigh head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by iRaceWeigh, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0