MARLVEL

LaGuardia Airport Flight Info vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against LaGuardia Airport Flight Info's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

LaGuardia Airport Flight Info
This App
FlightStats
Nemesis
FlightSky: Flight Tracker
Contender
Baltimore Airport BWI
Contender
台東機場航班時刻表
Contender
蘭嶼機場航班時刻表
Contender
Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport PHX
Peer
Dulles Washington Airport IAD
Peer
Philadelphia Airport PHL
Peer
Air Tracker For Ryanair
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperJohn MollaghanLNRS Data Services LimitedOcean Float MobileFlightInfoApps.comJIE STUDIOJIE STUDIOFlightInfoApps.comFlightInfoApps.comFlightInfoApps.comFikret Urgan
CategoryTravelTravelTravelTravel & LocalTravel & LocalTravel & LocalTravel & LocalTravel & LocalTravel & LocalTravel
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroidAndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 54.6 / 54.9 / 54.1 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count43277,7871,795260013248633
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 27, 2016Dec 18, 2012Oct 15, 2025Feb 14, 2015Sep 28, 2022Sep 28, 2022Apr 14, 2016May 7, 2014Apr 15, 2014Apr 27, 2016
Last UpdatedMay 11, 2026Oct 30, 2024Apr 1, 2026May 11, 2026Mar 22, 2026Mar 22, 2026May 11, 2026May 11, 2026May 11, 2026May 8, 2022
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-mixedterriblepositive--positive--terrible
Score-65/10015/10085/100--85/100--15/100
Praises-
  • Accurate real-time flight tracking provides essential utility for frequent travelers and family members
  • Basic visual presentation provides a functional foundation for the flight tracking interface
---
  • Real-time accuracy
--
  • Simple boarding pass access provides utility for travelers during airport transit
Complaints-
  • Account registration and verification failures prevent users from accessing personalized features
  • Deceptive subscription practices charge annual fees immediately despite advertised free trial periods
  • Inaccurate flight data and missing aircraft coverage render the tracking functionality useless
  • Misleading marketing claims promise advanced features like cockpit views that do not exist
---
  • Data latency
--
  • Mandatory app installation for boarding passes creates significant friction for travelers
  • Frequent session timeouts and login failures disrupt the check-in process
  • Aggressive upsell tactics and hidden fees degrade the user experience
Requests-
  • Integration with wearable devices to allow for quick flight status checks on the wrist
  • Functional unit conversion and dark mode settings to improve basic usability
------
  • Email delivery of boarding passes as an alternative to mandatory app usage
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Hyper-focused UX avoids global flight tracker bloat
  • Airport-specific queue data provides unique terminal utility
  • Minimalist interface reduces cognitive load for day-of-travel users
  • Siri Shortcuts integration reinforces daily app-open habits
  • Functional 2D map interface provides a baseline utility for casual tracking.
  • Hyper-focused BWI utility provides a cleaner, zero-friction interface for local users
  • Jie App integration creates a cross-service utility moat for regional travelers
  • Lightweight interface reduces cognitive load for casual users
  • Jie App series integration provides cross-modal transit utility for Taiwan travelers.
  • Hyper-local focus on Lanyu Airport reduces cognitive load for regional commuters.
  • Hyper-local focus on PHX airport data creates a high-intent, niche user base
  • High-precision local data for IAD airport operations
  • Utility-based feature gating converts frequent flyers to paid tiers
  • Single-airport focus provides faster load times for PHL-specific queries.
  • Dedicated Ryanair-only tracking interface reduces cognitive load for brand-loyal travelers
  • Real-time fleet monitoring creates high-frequency engagement loops for aviation enthusiasts
Weaknesses
  • Subscription gates data provided free by global rivals
  • Lack of push notifications limits re-engagement
  • Account registration failures block personalized feature access
  • Android UI regressions obscure critical flight information
  • Deceptive subscription billing triggers high refund rates.
  • Inaccurate flight data renders core tracking features useless.
  • Misleading marketing claims create a severe trust deficit.
  • Small user base (26 ratings) limits social proof and data-driven feature refinement
  • Manual update model limits real-time reliability
  • Zero-revenue model restricts investment in automated data feeds
  • Zero rating count indicates low user visibility.
  • Ad-supported revenue model lacks the stability of subscription-gated competitors.
  • Reliance on public flight data scrapers causes latency issues compared to airline-direct sources
  • Manual-check requirement for flight updates
  • Lacks automated push notifications for status changes
  • Single-airport scope limits user retention
  • Premium tier lacks unique value beyond ad-removal.
  • 3.47 rating on Android indicates poor stability
  • Mandatory app-check-in creates high-stress user scenarios
  • Frequent session timeouts during critical check-in tasks
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfree
MomentumMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieZombieMaintenance
Update Cadence1 versions5 versions2 versions, ~7d avg1 versions2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~0d avg1 versions1 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~918d avg

Compare LaGuardia Airport Flight Info head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LaGuardia Airport Flight Info, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0