Loud Alarm Clock by BLITZ vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Loud Alarm Clock by BLITZ's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperInfinite Wave Media, LLCMosaic S.r.l.FlagAppCompanyDOSA AppsLit Apps LLC (Mobile)MyZmanimLightApps OURivia Corp s.r.o.Rivon Group ltdLunar Apps
CategoryUtilitiesUtilitiesToolsToolsUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesHealth & Fitness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroidAndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.5 / 54.6 / 50.0 / 54.8 / 55.0 / 54.4 / 54.1 / 53.3 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count1,456123,7710153,69921101,415123130
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateDec 8, 2018Dec 12, 2013Nov 14, 2023Sep 26, 2011Apr 10, 2026Dec 17, 2019Oct 11, 2023Nov 1, 2023Mar 27, 2026Apr 28, 2026
Last UpdatedApr 2, 2026Jan 14, 2026Jan 2, 2026Oct 23, 2025Apr 30, 2026Mar 4, 2024Mar 23, 2026Nov 19, 2025May 12, 2026May 7, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativenegative--mixedmixedterrible---
Score35/10025/100--45/10045/10020/100---
Praises
  • High volume output provides effective wake-up utility for heavy sleepers
  • Simple and reliable alarm clock functionality provides consistent utility for long-term users
--
  • Reliable alarm functionality provides consistent morning wake-up support for daily work routines
  • High accuracy of religious timing calculations provides reliable daily utility for observant users globally
  • Core alarm functionality provides a reliable wake-up experience for users who avoid recent update regressions
---
Complaints
  • Alarm reliability issues prevent the app from triggering at set times
  • Aggressive subscription paywalls prevent basic alarm usage and frustrate users post-update
  • Frequent and intrusive video advertisements disrupt the core alarm setting experience
--
  • Accidental alarm deletion occurs too easily due to lack of confirmation safeguards
  • Mandatory phone number registration creates significant friction and privacy concerns for new users
  • Alarm failure and silent operation post-update leave users oversleeping for critical daily commitments
  • Aggressive subscription paywalls restrict access to basic features like custom song selection for alarms
---
Requests-
  • Transparent pricing models that allow basic alarm functionality without mandatory weekly subscriptions
--
  • Bulk alarm management features allow users to shift multiple schedules simultaneously
  • External calendar integration allows users to sync religious timings with personal scheduling tools
  • One-time purchase options requested as an alternative to expensive annual subscription models
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • High-decibel audio engineering provides a clear utility differentiator
  • Multi-tool utility footprint increases device stickiness
  • Challenge-based dismissal mechanics drive daily active habit formation
  • Long-click dismissal mechanism prevents accidental alarm shutdowns
  • Gentle alarm sound-decay logic provides a differentiated, non-jarring wake-up experience
-
  • Ad-free minimalist interface sustains organic install velocity
  • Object-scan dismissal creates a high-retention wake-up habit
  • High-precision calculation engine provides reliable daily utility
  • Multi-rabbinic support caters to diverse religious traditions
  • Spotify API integration enables a personalized wake-up experience that standard system clocks cannot replicate.
---
Weaknesses
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap signals platform-specific technical instability
  • Screen-on requirement drives battery-drain complaints
  • Aggressive subscription paywalls block basic alarm usage
  • Frequent ad interruptions during critical morning interactions drive uninstalls
  • Reliability failures (silent alarms) erode core value proposition
  • Zero rating count on Android platform
  • No IAP or subscription revenue model implemented
  • Lack of social proof or brand recognition
-
  • 3.9 Android rating reflects functional regressions
  • Lack of deletion safeguards causes user frustration
  • Mandatory phone registration creates high churn
  • Location service failures render core functionality unusable
  • Heavy resource usage impacts low-connectivity performance
  • Critical alarm failure post-update; annual subscription cost exceeds the value perceived by users for a simple utility.
---
Pricingsubscriptionfreemiumfreefreefreefreesubscriptionfreefreefree
MomentumIntenseMaintenanceZombie-MaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceIntense-
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions, ~26d avg1 versions-4 versions, ~85d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~749d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~22d avg5 versions4 versions-

Compare Loud Alarm Clock by BLITZ head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Loud Alarm Clock by BLITZ, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0