Make: Magazine vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Make: Magazine's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Woodsmith
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperMake Community, LLCMeredith CorporationFlying Media Group, LLCActive Interest Media, IncMortons Media Group LtdPocketmags.comhauserHuge Tooth StudiosFOREFOMobway Solutions SRL
CategoryLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleMagazines & NewspapersReferenceLifestyleTools-Art & DesignLifestyle
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating2.0 / 54.7 / 51.5 / 53.7 / 55.0 / 54.9 / 54.0 / 5-3.8 / 53.7 / 5
Ratings Count25131233115378-8524
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 20, 2014May 1, 2014May 24, 2013Aug 25, 2018Dec 12, 2012Oct 20, 2012Mar 19, 2026-Oct 26, 2022Feb 23, 2016
Last UpdatedJun 3, 2026Feb 21, 2026Feb 18, 2026Jan 23, 2026Feb 12, 2025Dec 22, 2025Apr 29, 2026-Jan 3, 2026Feb 28, 2018
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegative-negative-------
Score20/100-20/100-------
Praises----------
Complaints----------
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Strong brand identity within the hacker and DIY-tech community
  • Deep technical content library for electronics and robotics
  • Editorial authority in woodworking plans provides high switching costs for serious hobbyists.
  • Unbiased, expert-tested kit reviews provide a critical purchasing guide for high-intent hobbyists.
  • Detailed illustration library provides clear construction guidance for beginners.
----
  • Specialized cross-stitch focus provides a clutter-free experience
  • Free access model removes the entry barrier for casual hobbyists
  • User-submitted content model functions as a low-cost, scalable content acquisition engine
  • Push notification loop drives re-engagement for new how-to guides
Weaknesses
  • 2.04 rating on iOS indicates severe stability issues
  • Lack of offline reading mode limits utility in workshop environments
  • Subscription-only access model restricts the user acquisition funnel compared to ad-supported DIY competitors.
  • 1.48-star rating indicates poor app stability and reading experience.
  • Transactional issue-purchase model lacks recurring value compared to subscription-based rivals.
  • 3.03 rating on Android indicates technical stability issues.
  • No cloud-save functionality for user progress.
----
  • Static image-only content lacks instructional depth
  • No offline mode limits utility in remote workshop settings
  • Ad-supported model creates friction during project viewing
  • 3.7-star rating indicates poor user satisfaction
  • No offline access prevents usage during hands-on crafting
  • Premium tier missing limits monetization potential
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfree-freefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceSteady-Intense-ZombieZombie
Update Cadence1 versions5 versions, ~63d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~633d avg5 versions, ~50d avg5 versions-5 versions-1 versions1 versions

Compare Make: Magazine head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Make: Magazine, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0