High confidence · Latest 107 of 289 total reviews analyzed
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate comprehensive collection tracking and deck building tools provide significant value for dedicated players, but report inconsistent card scanning performance makes cataloging large collections a frustrating and time-consuming manual process.
Rating: 4.7
Reviews: 289
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.3/ 5
★★★★★★
(10.8K)Current version
4.7/ 5
+0.4 vs overall
★★★★★★
(1.5K)Main signal post-update: comprehensive collection tracking and deck building tools provide significant value for dedicated players.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Comprehensive collection tracking and deck building tools provide significant value for dedicated players
- “Users frequently cite the app as the primary tool for managing large card inventories and deck lists”
- “The ability to track card prices and organize collections is consistently highlighted as a core benefit”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Inconsistent card scanning performance makes cataloging large collections a frustrating and time-consuming manual process
- “Users report that the scanner frequently misidentifies cards or fails to recognize them entirely”
- “Dark-colored cards and specific art styles are cited as major points of failure for the scanning algorithm”
Request
Most requested
- Desktop or web-based interface requested to facilitate easier management of large card collections
- “Users request a PC-compatible version to avoid the limitations of mobile-only data entry”
- “The lack of a web portal is cited as a barrier to efficient bulk collection management”