High confidence · 99 reviews analyzed · Based on 99 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate engaging gameplay and visuals and performance, but report aggressive pay-to-win mechanics and false advertising.
Rating: 4.6
Reviews: 99
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.3/ 5
★★★★★★
(38.6K)Current version
4.6/ 5
+0.2 vs overall
★★★★★★
(5K)Main signal post-update: engaging Gameplay.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Engaging Gameplay
- “interestingly enough to continuously play the game”
- “Nice story, fun to play”
- “Time flies by on Mars as you explore, build, and squish giant bugs.”
- Visuals and Performance
- “better smoother than the first version graphics also better”
- “Very nice graphics, well designed for smooth playing ability”
- “Runs smooth on my Android”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Aggressive Pay-to-Win Mechanics
- “100% Pay to win. No skills needed. Just buy all the trash that is thrown out weekly”
- “I finally dropped out when I got tired of being harvested by the ‘prime minister’”
- “The greed is too strong with this one”
- False Advertising
- “Every advertisement of this game is not what this game. This is a builders game.”
- “it sucks, the game is something, the video is something else”
- “Another clone of a game, with a fake ad showing a game you might play”