Low confidence · 17 reviews analyzed
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate mineral identification accuracy provides significant utility for users exploring geological samples in the field, but report aggressive premium paywalls interrupt the core scanning workflow and prevent basic functionality usage.
Rating: 4.0
Reviews: 17
Confidence: low
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.1/ 5
★★★★★
(493)Current version
5.0/ 5
+0.9 vs overall
★★★★★
(7)Main signal post-update: mineral identification accuracy provides significant utility for users exploring geological samples in the field.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Limited review volume (17 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.