MARLVEL

Mr Jeff - On-Demand Laundry vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Mr Jeff - On-Demand Laundry's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Mr Jeff - On-Demand Laundry
This App
Tide Cleaners | Dry Cleaning
Nemesis
SPIN CYCLES
Contender
The Laundry House
Contender
Love2Laundry: Pickup & Clean
Contender
LaundroKart
Contender
Tumbledry Dry Clean & Laundry
Contender
Dry Clean & Laundry DhobiLite
Contender
Laundry Lockers
Peer
QuickWash: On-Demand CarWash
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperMr JeffThe Procter & Gamble CompanyNarendra KumarLoadUp.appNadeem AbbasKleenCo On-Demand ServicesDC WEB SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITEDElite Dhobilite Laundry Private LimitedLaundry Lockers LLCQuickwash Technologies, Inc
CategoryLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyle
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.9 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 52.0 / 53.7 / 51.7 / 52.3 / 53.7 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count27,2741353113310
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateDec 5, 2024May 8, 2023Dec 31, 2019Jul 9, 2021Mar 19, 2015Feb 25, 2021Dec 15, 2019Jul 5, 2016Dec 5, 2023Sep 5, 2025
Last UpdatedDec 16, 2025Apr 23, 2026Nov 26, 2025Mar 9, 2026Nov 12, 2025Apr 29, 2024May 12, 2026Feb 8, 2026Feb 15, 2026May 12, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment----negative--mixedmixed-
Score----20/100--46/10040/100-
Praises-------
  • Premier Laundry & Dry-Cleaning Service Provider
  • The recent update introduces a refund button that provides users with more control over their service experience
-
Complaints----
  • Booking flow friction
  • Lack of transparency
--
  • Inconsistent service reliability
  • Service availability remains a persistent issue because lockers appear as available while being offline
-
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Subscription-based logistics model stabilizes utilization
  • Specialized cleaning for sneakers/helmets captures broader maintenance needs
  • Digital-first pickup flow reduces service friction
  • Procter & Gamble brand equity drives immediate consumer trust
  • GreenEarth solvent provides a non-toxic care differentiator
  • 24-hour kiosk hardware reduces franchise labor costs
  • 30-store physical footprint establishes local market presence
  • Specialized saree/leather care captures high-value regional garment segments
  • Agile development cycle enables rapid integration of niche local features
  • Lower overhead costs allow for aggressive promotional pricing
  • Commercial linen service provides stable B2B revenue
  • 24-hour turnaround captures high-intent users
  • In-house processing using Italian hydrocarbon machinery ensures quality control
  • 50+ exclusive outlets provide tangible trust
  • Specialized services like Saree roll polishing address local cultural needs
  • Live store transparency builds consumer trust
  • Specialized cleaning protocols secure high-value segments
  • Extensive geographic coverage across 50+ Indian cities provides a massive B2C distribution footprint.
  • B2B distribution model via property owners
  • Low-friction locker-based drop-off mechanism
  • Real-time technician tracking reduces user anxiety regarding service arrival
  • Transparent, upfront pricing eliminates the friction of traditional service haggling
Weaknesses
  • Two-working-day turnaround is slower than 24-hour market average
  • Lack of real-time order tracking reduces transparency
  • No website-based booking content limits acquisition
  • Regional service footprint limits national scaling
  • Variable turnaround times lack the predictability of gig-based rivals
  • No subscription-based recurring revenue model
  • Zero Android rating/reviews indicates poor digital adoption
  • Lack of real-time order tracking increases support overhead
  • 0 Android ratings indicate failed platform penetration
  • Lack of subscription model prevents recurring revenue lock-in
  • 2.0★ rating on iOS indicates failed user trust
  • Zero Android review volume suggests poor visibility
  • 0-rating Android footprint indicates low digital adoption
  • Lack of 24-hour self-service kiosks limits convenience
  • 3-rating iOS base suggests UX friction
  • Transactional booking model lacks retention loops
  • 1.7★ iOS rating indicates significant UX friction
  • 2.33-star iOS rating indicates a broken digital booking experience that erodes user trust.
  • 0 rating on Android platform
  • Persistent mismatch between digital status and physical locker state
  • High-frequency complaints regarding service availability
  • Lack of recurring revenue models compared to membership-based rivals
  • Zero Android rating count indicates low penetration on the platform
Pricingfreemiumfreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieIntenseZombieMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~8d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~110d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~615d avg3 versions, ~4d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~13d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg

Compare Mr Jeff - On-Demand Laundry head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mr Jeff - On-Demand Laundry, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0