Report updated Jun 17, 2026
New York Penal Code (2017 LawStack NY Series)
For legal professionals, attorneys, and law students requiring portable, offline access to statutes.
New York Penal Code (2017 LawStack NY Series) is a market-leading reference app that is free with in-app purchases. With a 4.4/5 rating from 18 reviews, it delivers strong user satisfaction. Users particularly appreciate comprehensive access to legal statutes provides high utility for daily professional practice, though limited depth of information fails to meet expectations for specific legal research needs remains a common concern.
What is New York Penal Code (2017 LawStack NY Series)?
LawStack is a mobile legal reference library providing offline access to New York penal codes for attorneys and law students.
Users hire this app for reliable, offline access to statutes in environments where internet connectivity is restricted or unavailable.
Current Momentum
v8.516 · 1mo ago
Active- Ships minor navigation fixes.
- Handles download cancellation exceptions.
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
What Are The Key Features?
Full legal library content stored locally on the device for access without internet connectivity.
Search engine for locating specific statutes, regulations, and rules within the downloaded legal database.
User-defined markers and annotations saved to specific legal sections for quick retrieval.
In-app purchase system to unlock updated versions of specific legal codes.
How much does it cost?
- Free base library
- Pro subscription for updated codes
Freemium model uses free base content to drive installs, gating current legal codes behind pro-tier subscriptions.
Who Built It?
Tekk Innovations
Providing legal professionals and aviation experts with portable, offline access to critical regulatory codes and statutes. They bridge the gap between bulky physical reference materials and mobile-first utility.
Portfolio
13
Apps
What other apps does Tekk Innovations make?
LawStack: CFR,USC,Statutes,Law
FAR/AIM - FAA Pilot Reference
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (LawStack's FRCP)
T-Charts (Pros and Cons)
Federal Rules of Evidence (LawStack's FRE)
FRAP by LawStack
Explore the full Tekk Innovations report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Tekk Innovations.
What do users think recently?
Low confidence · 7 reviews analyzed
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a thrilled sentiment. Users appreciate comprehensive access to legal statutes provides high utility for daily professional practice and frequent content updates ensure legal information remains accurate and relevant for users, but report limited depth of information fails to meet expectations for specific legal research needs.
Limited review volume (7 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for New York Penal Code (2017 LawStack NY Series)?
How's The Reference Market?
Market outlook for this category
Available very soon
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
This app serves the exact same job-to-be-done as the target: providing offline, searchable access to specific national legal codes.
Differentiators
- Provides a highly localized legal database that directly addresses the specific regulatory needs of Ukrainian citizens.
- Maintains a significantly higher release velocity to ensure legal code accuracy compared to the target's 2017-era base.
Same space(3)
Shares the 'reference library' architecture, focusing on deep hierarchical content organization and offline study tools.
Differentiators
- Features advanced cross-referencing and annotation synchronization across devices that the target app currently lacks.
- Provides a highly polished, proprietary content delivery system optimized for massive, multi-volume text libraries.
A powerful offline reference engine that serves as a horizontal competitor for any static, text-heavy legal library.
Differentiators
- Offers a universal offline reader that allows users to download entire Wikipedia or legal databases locally.
- Utilizes an open-source architecture that eliminates the need for the in-app purchase model used by the target.
Operates in the professional reference space, though it focuses on institutional library access rather than individual penal code downloads.
Differentiators
- Integrates with institutional library credentials to provide enterprise-grade access to massive legal and professional document collections.
- Leverages the established OverDrive infrastructure to manage digital rights and lending periods for professional legal content.
New entrants(1)
Demonstrates high-frequency release cycles and modern UI/UX standards that set a new bar for reference app engagement.
Differentiators
- Integrates audio-guided reading plans that transform static text into an interactive, time-bound user experience.
- Employs a modern, clean interface design that prioritizes readability and navigation over the target's legacy document-viewer style.
Compare New York Penal Code (2017 LawStack NY Series) against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for New York Penal Code (2017 LawStack NY Series)
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Offline-first architecture enables courtroom utility
- Personalized annotation system increases user switching costs
Critical Frictions
- 2017-era base library creates accuracy risk
- Legacy document-viewer UI lacks modern navigation
Growth Levers
- B2B partnerships with law firms for bulk licensing
- Integration of audio-guided reading plans
Market Threats
- High-velocity competitors like Кодекси: Дія KУпАП
- Open-source offline readers like Kiwix
What are the next best moves?
Audit legal database currency because 2017-era base creates accuracy risk → reduce churn to high-velocity competitors
Competitor analysis shows high-velocity rivals directly threaten the app's reliability moat.
Trade-off: Pause UI navigation improvements — database accuracy is the primary retention driver.
Modernize document-viewer UI because legacy style fails to meet engagement standards → improve session duration
Newer competitors like Ascension set a higher bar for reference app engagement.
Trade-off: Deprioritize content sharing feature updates — UI modernization is critical for competitive parity.
A counter-intuitive read
The app's reliance on a 2017-era base is a feature, not a bug, if it allows for a stable, unchanging reference point that professional users trust for historical statute lookup.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Real-time statute synchronization (available in Кодекси: Дія KУпАП but absent here)
- Universal offline reader architecture (available in Kiwix but absent here)
Key Takeaways
LawStack provides essential offline utility, but its reliance on outdated statutes threatens its professional standing, so the PM must prioritize database currency to prevent churn to high-velocity rivals.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
The legal reference market is consolidating around high-velocity, frequently updated databases that render static, legacy libraries obsolete. LawStack remains stable due to its offline utility, but it is exposed to churn if it fails to modernize its update cadence.
The 2017-era base library creates an accuracy liability that high-velocity competitors exploit to erode the professional user base.
Offline-first architecture remains a strong retention lever for legal professionals working in courtrooms with limited connectivity.