Padel Stats vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Padel Stats's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Padel Stats
This App
ScorePadel
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperPerkodar ABPadelMatch Inc.Maksym KarpenkoJordan ALCARAZKodeon, Inc.NICHOLAS JASPER DILLON
CategorySportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSports
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count01122660
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99
Release DateJun 9, 2021Mar 10, 2026Feb 11, 2026Sep 16, 2025Sep 28, 2022Apr 17, 2026
Last UpdatedJun 21, 2021May 8, 2026May 11, 2026Apr 29, 2026Dec 10, 2025Apr 24, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment---excellentmixed-
Score---95/10050/100-
Praises----
  • The core application functionality provides a simple and useful utility for managing sports tournaments
-
Complaints----
  • Tournament generation logic fails to randomize partners correctly when configuring matches for six participants
-
Requests------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • YouTube-based video analysis provides a low-cost, platform-agnostic review mechanism for match footage
  • Social-first partner discovery mechanism drives community network effects
  • Instagram-integrated match recaps provide organic viral distribution
  • Native Apple Watch integration provides a frictionless scoring mechanism during play
  • Americano-specific scoring logic captures the high-frequency social tournament segment
  • Public web-link sharing functions as a viral distribution mechanism for tournament discovery.
  • Single-purpose UX reduces configuration complexity for casual organizers
  • Point-based scoring gamifies individual performance to increase session frequency
  • Standalone watch-first architecture removes phone-dependency friction
  • One-time $0.99 price point lowers entry barrier
Weaknesses
  • Manual data entry creates high user friction compared to wearable-integrated rivals
  • Zero monetization strategy limits long-term sustainability
  • Zero monetization model creates long-term sustainability risk
  • Lack of tournament-grade automation limits appeal to high-frequency organizers
  • Zero monetization strategy limits long-term development budget
  • 1-review total count indicates low organic discovery velocity
  • Zero monetization strategy limits the ability to fund long-term development.
  • Partner rotation algorithm fails for six-person tournaments
  • Review volume is insufficient to validate recent stability updates
  • Lack of historical match analytics limits retention
  • No tournament-management features restricts club adoption
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreemiumpaid
MomentumZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceSteadyMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~1247d avg1 versions2 versions, ~402d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg5 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo

Compare Padel Stats head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Padel Stats, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0