| Core Identity |
| Developer | PadelMatch Inc. | Perkodar AB | Eritheia Labs | Jorge Fabra | TPC Matchpoint | Jordan ALCARAZ | Perkodar AB | Kodeon, Inc. | Maksym Karpenko | Clutch Sports |
| Category | Sports | Sports | Sports | Sports | Sports | Sports | Sports | Sports | Sports | Sports |
| Platform | iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | Android, iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Store Metrics |
| Rating | 5.0 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 | 0.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 | 3.0 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 | 0.0 / 5 | 4.9 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 |
| Ratings Count | 1 | 122 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 266 | 1 | 1 |
| Price | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Release Date | Mar 10, 2026 | Oct 22, 2020 | Feb 25, 2026 | Oct 14, 2021 | Jan 30, 2024 | Sep 16, 2025 | Jun 9, 2021 | Sep 28, 2022 | Feb 11, 2026 | Mar 10, 2023 |
| Last Updated | May 8, 2026 | May 9, 2026 | Apr 27, 2026 | Sep 30, 2022 | Jun 10, 2025 | Apr 29, 2026 | Jun 21, 2021 | Dec 10, 2025 | May 11, 2026 | May 18, 2026 |
| Sentiment & Reviews |
| Sentiment | - | excellent | negative | excellent | - | excellent | - | mixed | - | - |
| Score | - | 90/100 | 25/100 | 90/100 | - | 95/100 | - | 50/100 | - | - |
| Praises | - | - Ease of setup for social tournaments
| - Broad channel selection provides significant entertainment value for the monthly subscription cost
| - The application provides a user-friendly interface for booking the local padel court facilities
| - | - | - | - The core application functionality provides a simple and useful utility for managing sports tournaments
| - | - |
| Complaints | - | - | - Constant buffering and playback interruptions prevent consistent viewing of live television content
- Login failures and authentication errors prevent access to the service after initial setup
| - | - | - | - | - Tournament generation logic fails to randomize partners correctly when configuring matches for six participants
| - | - |
| Requests | - | - | - Grid style program guide requested to allow viewing multiple channels simultaneously
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Strategic Intel |
| Strengths | - Social-first partner discovery mechanism drives community network effects
- Instagram-integrated match recaps provide organic viral distribution
| - High-reliability tournament rotation algorithm sustains organic install velocity
- Shareable live-web scoreboard functions as a viral distribution mechanism at padel venues
- Native Swift architecture ensures low-latency performance on iOS
| - Unified interface combining scoring and management tools reduces app-switching for organizers.
| - Integrated club management suite provides a single-app experience for booking, news, and social play
| - Integrated tournament management provides a centralized hub for club-specific competitive play
| - Public web-link sharing functions as a viral distribution mechanism for tournament discovery.
| - YouTube-based video analysis provides a low-cost, platform-agnostic review mechanism for match footage
| - Single-purpose UX reduces configuration complexity for casual organizers
- Point-based scoring gamifies individual performance to increase session frequency
| - Native Apple Watch integration provides a frictionless scoring mechanism during play
- Americano-specific scoring logic captures the high-frequency social tournament segment
| - |
| Weaknesses | - Zero monetization model creates long-term sustainability risk
- Lack of tournament-grade automation limits appeal to high-frequency organizers
| - Premium tier lacks financial integration compared to Set Padel's digital wallet
- No integrated club-level agenda or news feed to retain users between tournaments
- Multi-court support is gated behind a premium purchase, limiting adoption in large clubs
| - 2.61 rating on Android indicates critical stability failures.
- Authentication errors block core access for returning users.
| - Single-review volume limits social proof
- Lack of automated tournament generation creates administrative friction for organizers
| - 3.0 rating on iOS with only 2 reviews indicates low user engagement
- 0 ratings on Android platform signals lack of critical mass
| - Zero monetization strategy limits the ability to fund long-term development.
| - Manual data entry creates high user friction compared to wearable-integrated rivals
- Zero monetization strategy limits long-term sustainability
| - Partner rotation algorithm fails for six-person tournaments
- Review volume is insufficient to validate recent stability updates
| - Zero monetization strategy limits long-term development budget
- 1-review total count indicates low organic discovery velocity
| - |
| Pricing | free | freemium | free | free | free | free | free | freemium | free | freemium |
| Momentum | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Zombie | Maintenance | Maintenance | Zombie | Steady | Maintenance | Intense |
| Update Cadence | 1 versions | 2 versions, ~1d avg | 2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~6d avg | 2 versions, ~1302d avg | 2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~28d avg | 2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg | 2 versions, ~1247d avg | 5 versions | 2 versions, ~402d avg | 5 versions |
