High confidence · Latest 100 of 120 total reviews analyzed · Based on 120 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate long-term reliability of cycle tracking provides consistent value for users over many years, but report inaccurate cycle predictions following recent updates cause significant frustration for long-term users.
Rating: 4.6
Reviews: 120
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.5/ 5
★★★★★★
(432.5K)Current version
4.8/ 5
+0.3 vs overall
★★★★★
(73.2K)Main signal post-update: long-term reliability of cycle tracking provides consistent value for users over many years.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Rating over time
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Releases:MajorMinorPatch2 releases in range
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Long-term reliability of cycle tracking provides consistent value for users over many years
- “Users report consistent usage spanning over a decade”
- “The app is frequently cited as a primary tool for managing menstrual health”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Inaccurate cycle predictions following recent updates cause significant frustration for long-term users
- “Users report the app provides incorrect dates for upcoming cycles”
- “The algorithm is perceived as less accurate than in previous versions”
Request
Most requested
- Reset button for calendar and dashboard data to allow for fresh tracking starts
- “Users request a way to clear historical data without deleting the app”